CR-088 · Detailed guide · Theme 6

Neighbourhood Presence Plan

Help the club choose a few local places and relationships where the club will show up consistently and usefully.

Where this idea came from

Playbook entry: CR-088 · Neighbourhood Presence Plan
Theme: Theme 6: Club Renewal · Subtheme 7: Community Reconnection
Source material: New Club Renewal index draft plus an internally authored detailed-guide draft

Initiative-specific development wave

How this draft was developed

These sources support general principles for whole-club renewal, accessibility, privacy, safety, systems or responsible governance; they are not an endorsement of Neighbourhood Presence Plan, a finding that it suits any club or approval of its local design.

Primary references consulted

Rotary Clubs (Rotary International)
Used for: Rotary describes club participation through service, friendship, diversity, integrity and leadership, including online participation for people affected by schedules, mobility or distance.
Rotary guidance for enhancing project impact (Rotary International - My Rotary)
Used for: Rotary provides project-planning resources to help clubs design and manage effective projects, find partners, share practice and improve impact.
Enhancing Belonging and Engagement at Rotary (Rotary International)
Used for: Rotary identifies belonging, respect, accessibility and equitable access to opportunities, networks and support as central to participation and thriving.
Posting photos and videos (Office of the Australian Information Commissioner)
Used for: Organisations should consider notice, consent, purpose, audience, security and withdrawal before collecting or publishing identifiable photos and videos.

Candidate District material

No candidate local guide was used for this version. The current initiative identity and the attributed primary references remain separate.

Theme 6 source-assurance wave

What has been checked

4 current primary pages used by this guide were reopened on 9 August 2026.
4 attributed source claim(s) were mapped to their bounded use in this initiative.
Candidate District material remains separate and does not establish this result.

See each source's scope and limit

Rotary Clubs
Supports: Rotary club participation context and the value of service, connection, integrity, leadership and accessible participation during renewal.
Does not establish: A local renewal priority, governance authority, member preference, community need, club decision or approval of a named initiative.
Rotary service-project impact resources
Supports: The availability of Rotary project-planning, collaboration and impact-support resources for service-led renewal.
Does not establish: That a project is feasible, authorised, funded, locally suitable, sustainable or demonstrably effective.
Enhancing Belonging and Engagement at Rotary
Supports: Belonging, accessibility, respectful participation and equitable access principles for renewal and club experience.
Does not establish: That a particular meeting model, membership pathway, leadership process or club culture is inclusive without testing with affected people.
Posting photos and videos
Supports: Privacy-aware capture, publication, reuse and withdrawal controls for identifiable media used in renewal communications.
Does not establish: That consent is valid, that publication is authorised or that every person depicted or every Rotary club is covered by the Privacy Act.

What still needs a person to confirm

Confirm the club's governing documents, bylaws, membership rules, decision authority, financial position and reserved decisions before changing its operating model.
Confirm which incorporated-association, charity, work health and safety, privacy, safeguarding and other duties apply to the club and this renewal design.
Test the need, accessibility, belonging, workload and alternative participation routes with current, former and prospective members rather than inferring support from the guide.
Confirm every local fact, starting point, measure, cost, owner, community need, capability claim and stopping condition before the club decides to proceed.
Resolve any candidate District-source provenance and approval decision without treating the candidate as controlled authority.

The source-verification release gate remains closed.

Checks still on hold

The controlled current Theme 6 catalogue establishes the code, title and renewal framing; the delivery content remains an internally authored draft pending full-corpus human review.
The connected Drive refresh returned an internal error on 9 August 2026. No unseen file was inferred or promoted; the 7 August intake, duplicate decisions, quarantines, rights boundaries and public-write permission hold remain in force and no sharing was changed.
Before local delivery, the club must approve the decision, participant choices, access arrangements, privacy and records plan, role boundaries, referral or escalation routes, resource limit and the specific control for this boundary: community engagement cannot extract stories, promise partnership authority or treat visibility as evidence of community value.
Formal human review has not started. Neighbourhood Presence Plan remains an internal initiative-specific draft until all 1,000 initiatives reach the Full-Corpus Review Build and every source, editorial, local-suitability, accessibility and governance gate is resolved.

Still an internal draft: source interpretation, local suitability, accessibility, governance and editorial approval remain open checks.

Why a club might use this

The work is designed to produce a tested current version with ownership, access, change and retirement controls; the central local boundary is that community engagement cannot extract stories, promise partnership authority or treat visibility as evidence of community value.

Use it when

Use when the club has become inward-looking, less visible or dependent on a small circle of familiar contacts. Neighbourhood Presence Plan is most useful when the club is prepared to act on what it learns.
A club where the club can make one honest, authorised change at a time from a shared diagnosis, visible evidence and a scheduled continue, adapt or stop decision.
A club with a real need for trusted community reconnection and capacity to support a maintained club artefact with a defined user, owner, version, source of truth and review cycle.
A 90-day trial of Neighbourhood Presence Plan with a starting point, named participants, a resource ceiling and a scheduled continue, adapt or stop decision.

Before the club starts

A board-approved brief naming which local relationships and invitation routes the club should rebuild, the local authority, people affected, fixed constraints, resource ceiling, decision date and stop conditions.
A starting-point record and participant plan suited to a maintained club artefact with a defined user, owner, version, source of truth and review cycle, with accessible information, voluntary choices and a supported alternative route where needed.
Named delivery, evidence and decision owners, including a person authorised to pause Neighbourhood Presence Plan when a safeguard, permission or boundary is not met.
A proportionate check of governing documents, privacy, information security, accessibility, conflicts, safeguarding, work health and safety, records, finance and referral duties for the actual local design.

Capacity guide

Likely cost: Low to medium; allow for travel, accessible venues, interpreting or participant support where appropriate.
Lead time: Six to eight weeks for relationship mapping, listening and co-design.
People: Four to six club members plus community participants and partners who choose to contribute.

A useful club conversation

Questions worth asking

Whose experience, authority, access or safety could be missed if Neighbourhood Presence Plan is designed only by regular attendees, confident digital users or current leaders?
What would make a tested current version with ownership, access, change and retirement controls credible enough for the club's decision, and what would still remain uncertain?
What local adaptation would still respect this boundary: Community engagement cannot extract stories, promise partnership authority or treat visibility as evidence of community value.

Common traps

Trying Neighbourhood Presence Plan when A club with no open decision, no accountable owner, no capacity to act on a tested current version with ownership, access, change and retirement controls or no safe way to pause the trial.
Proceeding with Neighbourhood Presence Plan when Neighbourhood Presence Plan must not be used for a rebrand without operational change, an attempt to blame current or former leaders or a programme that adds more work without stopping or redesigning anything. Community engagement cannot extract stories, promise partnership authority or treat visibility as evidence of community value.
The same small group carries the renewal work and becomes less sustainable. — Use workload gates, role pairing, staged delivery and a stop decision when capacity is not real.

A practical 90-day path

Three milestones for Neighbourhood Presence Plan
When	What the club does	Evidence to keep
Days 1–30: Agree the local design	Write the decision brief for Neighbourhood Presence Plan: define which local relationships and invitation routes the club should rebuild, the starting evidence, people affected, local authority, resource limit, success signals and stop conditions. Invite members with varied experiences and affected community partners where appropriate, show what is open or fixed, make access practical and record trade-offs and minority views. Apply this specifically to Neighbourhood Presence Plan and record which relevant experiences or users are still missing.	An approved decision and boundary brief A participant, access and information-handling plan
Days 31–60: Run and adjust the first version	Build and test a maintained club artefact with a defined user, owner, version, source of truth and review cycle for Neighbourhood Presence Plan; complete the Neighbourhood Presence Plan System Ownership and Version Register, rehearse the boundary wording and confirm who may decide, refer, pause, recover or close the work. Use a time-bounded change with named authority, capacity and stop conditions; compare evidence with the starting point and make unfinished work, unintended effects and resource pressure visible. Capture only the evidence needed to judge whether Neighbourhood Presence Plan advances trusted community reconnection.	A tested system ownership and version register and delivery pack A controlled activity and evidence record
Days 61–90: Review the evidence and decide	Compare the evidence with the starting point, validate meaning with affected participants or users, record gaps and unintended effects and prepare a tested current version with ownership, access, change and retirement controls without overstating what the trial proves. Make and record the authorised continue, adapt, refer, scale or stop decision for Neighbourhood Presence Plan; explain the reason, complete every action, close unnecessary records and schedule the 90-day follow-up.	A tested current version with ownership, access, change and retirement controls A published participant response, closed action register and next-step decision

Fit it to the club you have

Small club

Choose one change that releases rather than adds workload, use district or neighbouring-club help and avoid creating roles the club cannot sustain. Apply this specifically to Neighbourhood Presence Plan, a maintained club artefact with a defined user, owner, version, source of truth and review cycle and the club's actual capacity.

Larger club

Use a small portfolio board, clear workstream delegations and one evidence and dependency register so changes do not compete or duplicate effort. Apply this specifically to Neighbourhood Presence Plan, a maintained club artefact with a defined user, owner, version, source of truth and review cycle and the club's actual capacity.

Regional or rural club

Plan around travel, seasonal work, service availability and close-community privacy, and use remote district support where local capability is thin. Apply this specifically to Neighbourhood Presence Plan, a maintained club artefact with a defined user, owner, version, source of truth and review cycle and the club's actual capacity.

Metropolitan, hybrid or online club

Offer several participation routes and times, keep decision records accessible and ensure remote members can shape rather than merely observe the renewal. Apply this specifically to Neighbourhood Presence Plan, a maintained club artefact with a defined user, owner, version, source of truth and review cycle and the club's actual capacity.

Learn, adapt and know when to stop

Evidence worth keeping

Neighbourhood Presence Plan produces a tested current version with ownership, access, change and retirement controls by the promised decision date, with evidence limitations, participation gaps and unintended effects stated.
People affected can explain the purpose, their choices, the boundary and how to raise an access, privacy, safety or governance concern.
The trial shows whether trusted community reconnection improved from the recorded starting point without shifting hidden workload, risk or exclusion elsewhere.

Change course when

The club proceeds with Neighbourhood Presence Plan without respecting this boundary: community engagement cannot extract stories, promise partnership authority or treat visibility as evidence of community value. — Put the boundary in the brief and participant information, give the delivery lead stop authority and move any excluded matter to its responsible process.
Renewal becomes a long list of projects without a shared diagnosis or trade-offs. — Link each change to the agreed health picture, select one priority and record what will pause, stop or wait.
Consultation raises expectations beyond the authority or resources available. — Publish the decision boundary, resource ceiling and timetable and explain every accepted, deferred or declined proposal.

How to put it into practice

Detailed implementation steps for Neighbourhood Presence Plan
Step	Action	Suggested owner	Timing	Evidence or output
1	Write the decision brief for Neighbourhood Presence Plan: define which local relationships and invitation routes the club should rebuild, the starting evidence, people affected, local authority, resource limit, success signals and stop conditions.	Club board sponsor and renewal lead	Week one	An approved decision and boundary brief
2	Invite members with varied experiences and affected community partners where appropriate, show what is open or fixed, make access practical and record trade-offs and minority views. Apply this specifically to Neighbourhood Presence Plan and record which relevant experiences or users are still missing.	Club board sponsor and renewal lead with the access and privacy contacts	Weeks one and two	A participant, access and information-handling plan
3	Build and test a maintained club artefact with a defined user, owner, version, source of truth and review cycle for Neighbourhood Presence Plan; complete the Neighbourhood Presence Plan System Ownership and Version Register, rehearse the boundary wording and confirm who may decide, refer, pause, recover or close the work.	Facilitator and workstream owner	Before the trial	A tested system ownership and version register and delivery pack
4	Use a time-bounded change with named authority, capacity and stop conditions; compare evidence with the starting point and make unfinished work, unintended effects and resource pressure visible. Capture only the evidence needed to judge whether Neighbourhood Presence Plan advances trusted community reconnection.	Facilitator and workstream owner	Weeks three to eight	A controlled activity and evidence record
5	Compare the evidence with the starting point, validate meaning with affected participants or users, record gaps and unintended effects and prepare a tested current version with ownership, access, change and retirement controls without overstating what the trial proves.	Facilitator and workstream owner with an independent reviewer	Within seven days of the trial	A tested current version with ownership, access, change and retirement controls
6	Make and record the authorised continue, adapt, refer, scale or stop decision for Neighbourhood Presence Plan; explain the reason, complete every action, close unnecessary records and schedule the 90-day follow-up.	Club board and evidence reviewer	By day 90	A published participant response, closed action register and next-step decision

Controls and safeguards

Seek permission before using names, images, quotations or partner logos, and make no promise the club is not authorised and able to keep.
Treat listening as a relationship, not a recruitment tactic; record and complete promised follow-up even when no membership lead results.
The club proceeds with Neighbourhood Presence Plan without respecting this boundary: community engagement cannot extract stories, promise partnership authority or treat visibility as evidence of community value. — Put the boundary in the brief and participant information, give the delivery lead stop authority and move any excluded matter to its responsible process.
Renewal becomes a long list of projects without a shared diagnosis or trade-offs. — Link each change to the agreed health picture, select one priority and record what will pause, stop or wait.
Consultation raises expectations beyond the authority or resources available. — Publish the decision boundary, resource ceiling and timetable and explain every accepted, deferred or declined proposal.
The same small group carries the renewal work and becomes less sustainable. — Use workload gates, role pairing, staged delivery and a stop decision when capacity is not real.
The controlled current Theme 6 catalogue establishes the code, title and renewal framing; the delivery content remains an internally authored draft pending full-corpus human review.
The connected Drive refresh returned an internal error on 9 August 2026. No unseen file was inferred or promoted; the 7 August intake, duplicate decisions, quarantines, rights boundaries and public-write permission hold remain in force and no sharing was changed.
Before local delivery, the club must approve the decision, participant choices, access arrangements, privacy and records plan, role boundaries, referral or escalation routes, resource limit and the specific control for this boundary: community engagement cannot extract stories, promise partnership authority or treat visibility as evidence of community value.
Formal human review has not started. Neighbourhood Presence Plan remains an internal initiative-specific draft until all 1,000 initiatives reach the Full-Corpus Review Build and every source, editorial, local-suitability, accessibility and governance gate is resolved.

What to measure

Review Neighbourhood Presence Plan after 90 days. Look for whether community relationships generate better understanding, useful invitations and completed follow-up, and write down one decision the evidence supports.
Neighbourhood Presence Plan produces a tested current version with ownership, access, change and retirement controls by the promised decision date, with evidence limitations, participation gaps and unintended effects stated.
People affected can explain the purpose, their choices, the boundary and how to raise an access, privacy, safety or governance concern.
The trial shows whether trusted community reconnection improved from the recorded starting point without shifting hidden workload, risk or exclusion elsewhere.
Every accepted action has an owner, due date and completion evidence, and the club records a reasoned continue, adapt, refer, scale or stop decision.

Follow-up: At the 90-day review, compare the recorded measures with the starting point, resolve the listed governance holds and tell participants whether Neighbourhood Presence Plan will change, continue or stop.

Made for this initiative

Tailored supporting documents

These working documents use the decisions, safeguards and evidence needs of this initiative. Complete them with the people affected and keep the agreed version with the club's project record.

Neighbourhood Presence Plan Renewal Decision Brief

Connect the initiative to the agreed diagnosis, decision and capacity.

Open supporting document

Neighbourhood Presence Plan Member and Stakeholder Participation Plan

Reach the experiences needed for a credible renewal decision.

Open supporting document

Neighbourhood Presence Plan Current-State and Starting-Point Record

Create an honest baseline before the change begins.

Open supporting document

Neighbourhood Presence Plan 90-Day Renewal Run Sheet

Sequence one bounded change without overloading the club.

Open supporting document

Neighbourhood Presence Plan Trade-Off and Stop-Doing Register

Make the capacity released for renewal explicit.

Open supporting document

Neighbourhood Presence Plan Risk, Dependency and Escalation Register

Keep governance, people, money and partner risks visible.

Open supporting document

Neighbourhood Presence Plan Renewal Evidence and Decision Record

Close the cycle with evidence, learning and an authorised next step.

Open supporting document

Neighbourhood Presence Plan Community Reconnection Delivery Check

Test whether Neighbourhood Presence Plan genuinely advances trusted community reconnection within the subtheme boundary.

Open supporting document

Neighbourhood Presence Plan System Ownership and Version Register

Keep the artefact current, findable, controlled and maintainable.

Open supporting document

Neighbourhood Presence Plan Evidence, Decision and Close-Out Record

Bring the evidence, limitations, participant response and final decision for Neighbourhood Presence Plan into one accountable record.

Open supporting document

Related playbook entries

CR-087
CR-076

Supporting worksheets

Before your club says yes

Does the idea fit?

Talk with the people it is meant to serve and check that the need is real.

We have checked this

Who can say yes?

Name the person or group that can approve the work, spending and any safety arrangements.

We have checked this

Are people protected?

Check privacy, consent and safety. Collect only the information you genuinely need.

We have checked this

Can everyone take part?

Check the language, format, place, technology and cost for barriers.

We have checked this

Are the facts and permissions right?

Check names, claims, images, quotations, partner references and Rotary branding.

We have checked this

How will we learn?

Note where things stand now, check in at 30, 60 and 90 days, and decide what to do next.

We have checked this