R-053 · Theme 3 · Leadership Pathways
Experienced Member Coaching Program
Members share expertise through focused coaching and stay actively connected.
Developed further: this summary now draws on an initiative-specific internal editorial draft and attributed references. Human review has not started and will open only at the Full-Corpus Review Build.
What could this idea change?
It helps knowledge, confidence and encouragement move between members instead of resting with a few people.
It may suit: Members seeking guidance or a new challenge, and the people offering practical support.
A simple way to start
- Write a decision brief for Experienced Member Coaching Program: define which goal, evidence and boundaries will govern coaching, the evidence already held, people affected, local authority, fixed constraints, success signals and stop conditions. Who could lead it: Board sponsor and leadership-development lead
- Publish the capability or decision need, invite expressions of interest, make selection criteria and conflicts visible, and agree a role, authority, workload, support and exit route. Who could lead it: Board sponsor and leadership-development lead with the access and privacy contacts
- Build and test a coaching relationship focused on a participant-owned leadership goal; use the Experienced Member Coaching Contract, rehearse the boundary wording, check materials and confirm who can decide, refer, pause or close the activity. Who could lead it: Mentor, facilitator or role supervisor
- Use real but bounded practice, observation, reflection and feedback; protect confidential board or member information; and keep every decision with its authorised office-holder. Capture only the evidence needed to judge whether the trial achieved its stated aim: help experienced members support development without directing or counselling. Who could lead it: Mentor, facilitator or role supervisor
- Analyse the evidence against the starting point, validate meaning with the people involved, record exceptions and unintended effects, and prepare a coaching agreement, action experiments and closure note without overstating what the trial proves. Who could lead it: Mentor, facilitator or role supervisor and an independent reviewer
What should we look for?
- After 90 days, review Experienced Member Coaching Program. Look for transparent opportunities, supported first assignments and members choosing whether and how they wish to progress.
- Experienced Member Coaching Program produces a coaching agreement, action experiments and closure note by the promised decision date, with evidence limitations and any participation gaps stated.
- Participants complete a defined capability goal or work product with observed evidence rather than attendance alone.
- Authority, delegation, conflicts, confidentiality and workload stay within the written role agreement.
- Feedback and handover records show what changed, what remains unsupported and what the club will do next.
Before we say yes
- Does it fit a real local need?
- Can people take part safely and fairly?
- Are the facts, permissions and Rotary branding right?
- Who will lead it, and when will we review it?
