R-129 · A 90-day try-out

A club plan for Rotary Knowledge Exchange

Use this as a starting point. Cross out what does not fit, add what is missing and make it your club's own.

Where this idea came from

Playbook entry
R-129 · Rotary Knowledge Exchange
Theme
Theme 3: Retention & Member Support · Subtheme 9: Advanced Rotary Learning
Source material
Current playbook index title and category plus an internally authored detailed-guide draft

Initiative-specific development wave

How this draft was developed

These sources support general principles for retention and member support, accessibility, privacy, safety, systems or responsible governance; they are not an endorsement of Rotary Knowledge Exchange, a finding that it suits any club or approval of its local design.

Primary references consulted

  • Rotary Clubs (Rotary International)
    Used for: Rotary describes club participation through service, friendship, diversity, integrity and leadership, including online participation for people affected by schedules, mobility or distance.
  • Learning & Reference - learn by role (Rotary International - My Rotary)
    Used for: Rotary's current Learning & Reference hub identifies president and committee roles, links role resources and provides access to role-based learning and training materials.
  • Rotary guidance for enhancing project impact (Rotary International - My Rotary)
    Used for: Rotary provides project-planning resources to help clubs design and manage effective projects, find partners, share practice and improve impact.
  • Grants (Rotary International)
    Used for: Rotary Foundation grants support humanitarian activities with different purposes, scales, timeframes and eligibility requirements, including sustainable and measurable outcomes for global grants.

Candidate District material

No candidate local guide was used for this version. The current initiative identity and the attributed primary references remain separate.

Theme 3 source-assurance wave

What has been checked

  • 4 current primary pages used by this guide were reopened on 9 August 2026.
  • 4 attributed source claim(s) were mapped to their bounded use in this initiative.
  • Candidate District material remains separate and does not establish this result.
See each source's scope and limit
  • Rotary Clubs
    Supports: Rotary participation context and the value of service, connection, integrity, leadership and accessible participation in the member experience.
    Does not establish: Why a person joined, stayed or left, what support they want, whether a club meets their needs or approval of a named initiative.
  • Learning & Reference - learn by role
    Supports: The availability of current Rotary role resources and learning pathways for people supporting members and club experience.
    Does not establish: The duties, delegation, eligibility, authority, capability or training completion of a particular person in a particular club.
  • Rotary service-project impact resources
    Supports: The availability of Rotary project-planning, collaboration and impact-support resources for meaningful member participation.
    Does not establish: That a project is feasible, authorised, funded, locally suitable, sustainable, effective or likely to retain members.
  • Grants
    Supports: A high-level distinction between Rotary Foundation grant types, purposes, scales and outcome expectations.
    Does not establish: Eligibility, funding availability, approval, compliance, project quality or the suitability of a particular grant proposal.

What still needs a person to confirm

  • Confirm person-led consent, privacy, scope and referral boundaries before the club collects personal information or offers support.
  • Confirm which incorporated-association, charity, work health and safety, privacy, safeguarding and other duties apply to the club and this local design.
  • Test accessibility, belonging and participation with affected members rather than inferring suitability from the guide.
  • Confirm every local fact, starting point, measure, owner, current service contact and stopping condition before the club decides to proceed.
  • Resolve any candidate District-source provenance and approval decision without treating the candidate as controlled authority.

The source-verification release gate remains closed.

Checks still on hold

Still an internal draft: source interpretation, local suitability, accessibility, governance and editorial approval remain open checks.

1. Is this worth trying here?

What we hope will change: Use Rotary Knowledge Exchange to help experienced members keep learning and turn Rotary knowledge into useful club or community action.

2. Our 90-day try-out

What our club will do for Rotary Knowledge Exchange
StepWhat we will doWho could lead itOur dateHow we will know it is done
1Write the decision brief for Rotary Knowledge Exchange: define which verified Rotary topic members need to understand and how learning will influence a real club decision, the starting evidence, people affected, local authority, resource limit, success signals and stop conditions.Board sponsor and member-experience leadWeek oneAn approved decision and boundary brief
2Invite people across tenure and participation patterns, make involvement voluntary, offer accessible and non-digital routes, state what is open or fixed and protect private circumstances. Apply this specifically to Rotary Knowledge Exchange and record which relevant experiences or users are still missing.Board sponsor and member-experience lead with the access and privacy contactsWeeks one and twoA participant, access and information-handling plan
3Build and test a bounded 90-day initiative with a clear outcome, participant choices, safeguards and decision date for Rotary Knowledge Exchange; complete the Rotary Knowledge Exchange Initiative Delivery Blueprint, rehearse the boundary wording and confirm who may decide, refer, pause, recover or close the work.Initiative host and evidence custodianBefore the trialA tested initiative delivery blueprint and delivery pack
4Use a bounded, permission-led trial; keep interpretation with participants, record exceptions as well as successes and transfer any private, urgent or specialist matter to its responsible pathway. Capture only the evidence needed to judge whether Rotary Knowledge Exchange advances advanced Rotary learning.Initiative host and evidence custodianWeeks three to eightA controlled activity and evidence record
5Compare the evidence with the starting point, validate meaning with affected participants or users, record gaps and unintended effects and prepare a completed delivery and evidence pack supporting a continue, adapt or stop decision without overstating what the trial proves.Initiative host and evidence custodian with an independent reviewerWithin seven days of the trialA completed delivery and evidence pack supporting a continue, adapt or stop decision
6Make and record the authorised continue, adapt, refer, scale or stop decision for Rotary Knowledge Exchange; explain the reason, complete every action, close unnecessary records and schedule the 90-day follow-up.Authorised decision owner and follow-up leadBy day 90A published participant response, closed action register and next-step decision

3. Checks before we start

Things our club needs to check
QuestionWhat it means for usWho will checkDone?
Check the idea with the people affected and confirm its purpose, owner and practical limits before putting it into use.
Use only the personal information needed. Agree who will handle routine care and who should be contacted if a serious concern arises.
The club proceeds with Rotary Knowledge Exchange without respecting this boundary: the session must distinguish current official guidance, local interpretation and matters requiring specialist advice. — Put the boundary in the brief and participant information, give the delivery lead stop authority and move any excluded matter to its responsible process.
The same regular members define the need and the answer. — Recruit across tenure, attendance and contribution patterns and record who was missed.
A supportive activity becomes pressure, surveillance or informal case management. — Use voluntary contact choices, written role boundaries, referral routes and an immediate pause when the boundary is crossed.
The club gathers stories or personal circumstances that are not needed for its decision. — Minimise collection, separate private matters, restrict access and close or delete records under the approved plan.
The current Theme 3 index establishes the code and title. Placeholder-heavy Theme 3 Drive candidates remain quarantined and were not used as initiative evidence.
The connected Drive refresh returned an internal error on 9 August 2026. No unseen file was inferred or promoted; the 7 August intake, duplicate decisions, quarantines, rights boundaries and public-write permission hold remain in force and no sharing was changed.
Before local delivery, the club must approve the decision, participant choices, access arrangements, privacy and records plan, role boundaries, referral or escalation routes, resource limit and the specific control for this boundary: the session must distinguish current official guidance, local interpretation and matters requiring specialist advice.
Formal human review has not started. Rotary Knowledge Exchange remains an internal initiative-specific draft until all 1,000 initiatives reach the Full-Corpus Review Build and every source, editorial, local-suitability, accessibility and governance gate is resolved.

4. What changed?

What we will keep an eye on
What mattersWhere we are nowWhat we hope to seeHow we will checkWho
After 90 days, review Rotary Knowledge Exchange. Look for learning being completed, applied in a real role or decision and shared with others in a usable form.
Rotary Knowledge Exchange produces a completed delivery and evidence pack supporting a continue, adapt or stop decision by the promised decision date, with evidence limitations, participation gaps and unintended effects stated.
People affected can explain the purpose, their choices, the boundary and how to raise an access, privacy, safety or governance concern.
The trial shows whether advanced Rotary learning improved from the recorded starting point without shifting hidden workload, risk or exclusion elsewhere.
Every accepted action has an owner, due date and completion evidence, and the club records a reasoned continue, adapt, refer, scale or stop decision.

After 30 days

Is it reaching the right people? Is anything unsafe, unfair or harder than expected?

After 60 days

Make one useful change based on what people have told you.

After 90 days

Compare with where you started. Decide whether to change it, continue it or stop.

Made for this initiative

Tailored supporting documents

These working documents use the decisions, safeguards and evidence needs of this initiative. Complete them with the people affected and keep the agreed version with the club's project record.

01

Rotary Knowledge Exchange Decision and Member-Experience Brief

Define the change, decision, participant choices and limits before work begins.

Open supporting document
02

Rotary Knowledge Exchange Participation and Access Plan

Reach relevant members without making one format or attendance pattern the default.

Open supporting document
03

Rotary Knowledge Exchange Host Conversation and Boundary Script

Support consistent, humane contact without pressure or role drift.

Open supporting document
04

Rotary Knowledge Exchange Trial Run Sheet

Coordinate a safe first version with clear responsibilities.

Open supporting document
05

Rotary Knowledge Exchange Minimal Evidence Log

Retain only the evidence needed for the decision and follow-up.

Open supporting document
06

Rotary Knowledge Exchange Response and Follow-Up Register

Make the club's response visible and close every accepted action.

Open supporting document
07

Rotary Knowledge Exchange Advanced Rotary Learning Delivery Check

Test whether Rotary Knowledge Exchange genuinely advances advanced Rotary learning within the subtheme boundary.

Open supporting document
08

Rotary Knowledge Exchange Initiative Delivery Blueprint

Turn the initiative title into a locally authorised and testable club design.

Open supporting document
09

Rotary Knowledge Exchange Evidence, Decision and Close-Out Record

Bring the evidence, limitations, participant response and final decision for Rotary Knowledge Exchange into one accountable record.

Open supporting document

Before your club says yes

Does the idea fit?

Talk with the people it is meant to serve and check that the need is real.

Who can say yes?

Name the person or group that can approve the work, spending and any safety arrangements.

Are people protected?

Check privacy, consent and safety. Collect only the information you genuinely need.

Can everyone take part?

Check the language, format, place, technology and cost for barriers.

Are the facts and permissions right?

Check names, claims, images, quotations, partner references and Rotary branding.

How will we learn?

Note where things stand now, check in at 30, 60 and 90 days, and decide what to do next.

Worksheets for your club

Open them online, print them or change them to suit the way your club works.

01

Session plan

Use this worksheet to plan who the session is for, when it will happen, how people can take part and what happens afterwards.

Open worksheet
02

Learning guide

Use this worksheet to prepare a practical learning or mentoring session and follow up afterwards.

Open worksheet
03

Are we ready to try this?

Use this worksheet to decide whether a small first try is realistic and what the club must settle before it starts.

Open worksheet
04

Reflection log

Use this worksheet to hear what people experienced and decide what to change next.

Open worksheet