M-T1-CP-09-SD-01 — Business Partnership Proposal Template
Release control
| Field | Controlled value |
|---|---|
| Status | REVIEW — proposal only; nonbinding discussion and specialist review required |
| Supporting-document code | M-T1-CP-09-SD-01 |
| Exact derivative title | Business Partnership Proposal Template |
| Source initiative | M-T1-CP-09 - Local Business Partnership Drive |
| Source initiative code | M-T1-CP-09 |
| Source initiative title | Local Business Partnership Drive |
| Initiative disposition | Canonical retained with new title |
| Canonical parent | M-T1-CP-09 - Local Partnership Discovery and Development |
| Canonical parent code and title | M-T1-CP-09 - Local Partnership Discovery and Development |
| Named overlay or migration label | Business Outreach remains a named mode |
| Redirect or tombstone route | Permanent title alias from Local Business Partnership Drive to M-T1-CP-09 — Local Partnership Discovery and Development; retain M-T1-CP-09-SD-01 as the stable asset code |
| Family master | Playbook_F06_Partnership_Proposal_Agreement_Master.md |
| Family / master version | F06 / 1.0 |
| Recorded master SHA-256 | fa016ad4e5a11f96056499ddcd2cc6c5461c156b6d48068d783ddc98600e49e7 |
| Authoritative index | Playbook_Supporting_Documents_Master_Index.md v1.1 |
| Configured master variant | Master C — Partnership proposal narrative plus M-T1-CP-09-SD-01 business overlay |
| Derivative version | v0.1 |
DRAFT PROPOSAL — NONBINDING DISCUSSION — SUBJECT TO APPROVAL AND QUALIFIED LOCAL REVIEW
This proposal does not authorise work, spending, payment, fundraising, brand use, data/contact sharing, public announcement or reliance. It is not legal, tax, financial or insurance advice.
Adaptation note
For a business owner, executive or delegated community-investment/partnership decision-maker. Lead with a verified shared community outcome and explain why the business’s capability is relevant without flattery or assumed interest. Distinguish cash sponsorship, in-kind support, employee volunteering, expertise, venue, reach and referral. Control cost, valuation, authority, brand acknowledgement, data/contact sharing, procurement, tax, fundraising, conflicts and insurance. Keep Rotary membership separate from the partnership ask.
Instructions
- Complete discovery, authority verification and proportionate due diligence before issuing an external proposal.
- Use the current canonical Local Partnership Discovery and Development title; Business Outreach may remain a named mode.
- State mutual community value and beneficiary value before describing contributions. Do not treat the business as a funding source by default.
- Separate every proposed contribution category and record amount/value method, authority, conditions, evidence, timing and exit treatment.
- Separate acknowledgement from advertising or endorsement; no mark or public announcement accompanies an unapproved proposal.
- Map data/contact sharing and referral boundaries explicitly. A professional discussion does not authorise unrelated marketing or membership promotion.
- Offer a proportionate pilot and a real review/exit path. Resolve all fields and material evidence before external review.
Controlled fields
| Field | Completion instruction | Evidence |
|---|---|---|
| {{PARTNERSHIP_NAME}} | Enter the approved working name without implying a new entity/endorsement. | Naming/brand approval |
| {{ROTARY_ENTITY}} / {{ROTARY_CONTACT}} | Enter the correct Rotary entity and authorised lead. | Entity/governance records |
| {{BUSINESS_ENTITY}} / {{BUSINESS_CONTACT}} | Enter the verified business entity and decision-maker/authority. | Partner entity/written confirmation |
| {{NEED_OR_OPPORTUNITY}} | State the evidence-backed community need/opportunity. | Approved evidence register |
| {{SHARED_OUTCOME}} / {{BENEFICIARY_OR_AUDIENCE}} | State one achievable shared outcome and intended beneficiaries without guarantee/deficit language. | Approved proposal design |
| {{ROTARY_VALUE}} / {{BUSINESS_VALUE}} | State realistic capabilities each party could contribute. | Capability evidence/partner confirmation |
| {{BUSINESS_RELEVANCE}} | Explain specific capability fit without flattery or assumed interest. | Discovery/due-diligence record |
| {{PILOT_SCOPE}} / {{SCOPE_EXCLUDED}} | State included pilot activities, locations, outputs, exclusions and limits. | Scope approval |
| {{DELIVERABLES}} / {{ASSUMPTIONS}} / {{DEPENDENCIES}} | Define outputs/acceptance and every unverified dependency with owner/date. | Delivery/assumption logs |
| {{ROTARY_ROLES}} / {{BUSINESS_ROLES}} | State proposed responsibilities. | Draft RACI/partner confirmation |
| {{GOVERNANCE_DECISIONS_AND_ESCALATION}} | State leads, meetings, authority limits, reserved/joint decisions and escalation. | Governance review |
| {{CASH_SUPPORT}} / {{IN_KIND_SUPPORT}} / {{EMPLOYEE_VOLUNTEERING}} / {{EXPERTISE_VENUE_REACH_REFERRAL}} | Separate proposed contribution categories. | Contribution design/partner confirmation |
| {{COST_VALUE_AUTHORITY_AND_EVIDENCE}} | State costs, valuation method, approvals, conditions, payment/invoice and evidence. | Finance/procurement review |
| {{TAX_FUNDRAISING_AND_PROCUREMENT_REVIEW}} | Insert only professionally reviewed positions or clearly list unresolved reviews. | Finance/tax/legal review |
| {{BRAND_ACKNOWLEDGEMENT}} / {{COMMUNICATIONS_APPROVAL}} | Define acknowledgement, marks, advertising/endorsement boundary, spokespeople and correction. | Brand/communications/legal review |
| {{DATA_AND_CONTACT_BOUNDARIES}} | State minimum categories, purposes, roles, systems, notices, consent and no-sharing position. | Data map/privacy review |
| {{IP_AND_RIGHTS}} | State background/new content, licences, images, marks and third-party rights. | Rights/legal review |
| {{SAFETY_SAFEGUARDING_AND_INSURANCE}} | State applicable activity controllers, checks, supervision, incidents and reviewed coverage. | Risk/safeguarding/insurance review |
| {{CONFLICT_DISCLOSURE_AND_MANAGEMENT}} | State actual/potential/perceived conflicts, gifts, related parties and recusal/approval. | Conflict record |
| {{BASELINE_MEASURES_AND_REPORTING}} | Define baseline, output/quality/outcome/risk measures, owner and reporting cadence. | Measurement plan |
| {{START_END_AND_REVIEW}} | State proposed pilot term and review points. | Governance plan |
| {{SUCCESS_STOP_AND_EXIT}} | State success, redesign, pause/stop thresholds and close-out treatment. | Governance/risk approval |
| {{NEXT_STEP}} / {{NEXT_STEP_OWNER}} / {{NEXT_STEP_DUE_DATE}} | State one approved refinement or decision action. | Partnership action record |
| {{VERSION_ID}} / {{APPROVAL_DATE}} / {{REVIEWERS}} | Enter controlled proposal version/date/reviewers. | Document register |
Configured proposal body
Draft Proposal — Nonbinding Discussion — Subject to Approval and Local Legal Review
Asset: M-T1-CP-09-SD-01 — Business Partnership Proposal Template Version: {{VERSION_ID}} Proposal-stage approval date: {{APPROVAL_DATE}} Reviewers: {{REVIEWERS}}
1. Executive proposition
{{ROTARY_ENTITY}} and {{BUSINESS_ENTITY}} are exploring {{PARTNERSHIP_NAME}} in response to {{NEED_OR_OPPORTUNITY}}.
The proposed shared outcome is {{SHARED_OUTCOME}} for {{BENEFICIARY_OR_AUDIENCE}}.
{{ROTARY_ENTITY}} could contribute {{ROTARY_VALUE}}. {{BUSINESS_ENTITY}} could contribute {{BUSINESS_VALUE}}. These are possible contributions only and remain subject to each party’s approval, capability, budget, risk and legal review.
2. Why this relationship
{{BUSINESS_RELEVANCE}}
The rationale is capability fit and community value. It is not a claim of endorsement, exclusivity, community mandate, financial return, tax treatment or interest in Rotary membership.
3. Proposed pilot scope
Included pilot: {{PILOT_SCOPE}}
Expressly excluded: {{SCOPE_EXCLUDED}}
Deliverables and acceptance: {{DELIVERABLES}}
Assumptions: {{ASSUMPTIONS}}
Dependencies: {{DEPENDENCIES}}
4. Roles and governance
- Rotary roles: {{ROTARY_ROLES}}
- Business roles: {{BUSINESS_ROLES}}
- Governance, decisions and escalation: {{GOVERNANCE_DECISIONS_AND_ESCALATION}}
- Authorised contacts: {{ROTARY_CONTACT}} / {{BUSINESS_CONTACT}}
Operational contacts cannot bind either party beyond verified delegated authority.
5. Proposed contributions, costs and approvals
| Contribution category | Proposed treatment |
|---|---|
| Cash support/sponsorship | {{CASH_SUPPORT}} |
| In-kind goods/services | {{IN_KIND_SUPPORT}} |
| Employee volunteering | {{EMPLOYEE_VOLUNTEERING}} |
| Expertise, venue, reach or referral | {{EXPERTISE_VENUE_REACH_REFERRAL}} |
| Cost, valuation, authority and evidence | {{COST_VALUE_AUTHORITY_AND_EVIDENCE}} |
| Tax, fundraising, procurement and professional review | {{TAX_FUNDRAISING_AND_PROCUREMENT_REVIEW}} |
No contribution, payment, reimbursement, purchase, donation receipt or valuation is authorised by this proposal.
6. Brand, acknowledgement and communications
- Proposed acknowledgement and no-endorsement boundary: {{BRAND_ACKNOWLEDGEMENT}}
- Proof, spokesperson, publication and correction approvals: {{COMMUNICATIONS_APPROVAL}}
No mark use, advertising, media statement or public announcement accompanies this unapproved proposal.
7. Data, contact sharing, IP and rights
- Data/contact categories, purposes, roles, consent and sharing boundary: {{DATA_AND_CONTACT_BOUNDARIES}}
- Background/new content, licences and third-party rights: {{IP_AND_RIGHTS}}
Professional contact for this proposal is separate from public referrals, participant information, broader Rotary promotion and membership contact.
8. Safety, safeguarding and insurance
{{SAFETY_SAFEGUARDING_AND_INSURANCE}}
Any activity-specific risk, screening, supervision, incident, emergency or insurance term remains subject to specialist and legal review.
9. Conflicts
{{CONFLICT_DISCLOSURE_AND_MANAGEMENT}}
No person approves a related-party contribution or benefit in which they have an unmanaged conflict.
10. Measures, term and review
- Baseline, measures and reporting: {{BASELINE_MEASURES_AND_REPORTING}}
- Proposed pilot term/reviews: {{START_END_AND_REVIEW}}
- Success, redesign, pause/stop and exit: {{SUCCESS_STOP_AND_EXIT}}
Activity, visibility, donations, volunteer hours or enquiries are not described as community impact without appropriate outcome evidence.
11. Proposed next step
This proposal invites refinement and an approved next-stage decision. It does not authorise performance or create an agreement.
Next step: {{NEXT_STEP}} Owner: {{NEXT_STEP_OWNER}} Due date: {{NEXT_STEP_DUE_DATE}}
Contribution schedule
| Contribution | Provider | Cash/in-kind/category | Amount or value method | Authority | Timing | Conditions | Evidence/acceptance | Unused/exit treatment |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Proposal review checklist
- [ ] Correct entities, decision-makers and authority limits are verified.
- [ ] Shared outcome, beneficiary value and business relevance are evidence-backed.
- [ ] Pilot scope, exclusions, deliverables, assumptions and dependencies are explicit.
- [ ] Cash, in-kind, employee, expertise, venue, reach and referral contributions are separated.
- [ ] Cost, valuation, approval, procurement, tax, fundraising, evidence and exit questions have named reviewers.
- [ ] Acknowledgement is distinct from advertising/endorsement; no unapproved mark use/public announcement occurs.
- [ ] Data/contact sharing, referrals, privacy, security, retention and incident boundaries are mapped.
- [ ] Membership promotion is absent from the partnership ask and tracking permission.
- [ ] Safety, safeguarding, insurance, rights and conflict reviews are proportionate and complete/gated.
- [ ] Pilot measures distinguish outputs from outcomes and include redesign/stop/exit thresholds.
- [ ] Every controlled field and material claim is resolved/evidenced.
- [ ] Proposal remains nonbinding discussion; it is not accompanied by payment, logo use or performance.
Review record
| Review domain | Reviewer | Outcome / required change | Date |
|---|---|---|---|
| Entity, authority and partner fit | |||
| Scope, capability and governance | |||
| Finance, tax, procurement and fundraising | |||
| Privacy, data, security and contact sharing | |||
| Brand, communications, IP and rights | |||
| Safety, safeguarding, insurance and conflicts | |||
| Qualified local legal review, if required at this stage | |||
| Final proposal-stage approval |
