Use this as a starting point. Cross out what does not fit, add what is missing and make it your club's own.
Where this idea came from
Playbook entry
E-004 · New Member First Project Pathway
Theme
Theme 2: Engagement & Belonging · Subtheme 1: Onboarding & First 90 Days
Source material
Current playbook index title and category plus an internally authored detailed-guide draft
Initiative-specific development wave
How this draft was developed
The cited sources support general principles for engaging new members and planning, implementing and evaluating projects; they do not constitute Rotary International endorsement of the locally named New Member First Project Pathway initiative or its detailed design.
Primary references consulted
Project Lifecycle Resources(Rotary International) Used for: A comprehensive project plan helps manage resources, anticipate problems and evaluate success.; Rotary's project lifecycle includes planning, implementation, communication, evaluation and learning, grounded in community needs.
Engaging Younger Professionals: Engage Emerging Leaders(Rotary International) Used for: New members should be invited to participate in service projects and other club experiences so their interests can be understood.; Clubs should check in and offer support as new members take on projects or responsibilities.
Candidate District material consulted
These records remain draft evidence and still need a human source decision.
Club Playbook - Theme 2 A first project pathway beginning within the member's first 30 days,Support from a project lead or buddy,A bounded contribution followed by reflection
Theme 2 source-assurance wave
What has been checked
2 current primary pages used by this guide were reopened on 9 August 2026.
4 attributed source claim(s) were mapped to their bounded use in this initiative.
Candidate District material remains separate and does not establish this result.
See each source's scope and limit
Project Lifecycle Resources Supports: The 3 attributed Theme 2 claims attached to this source, limited to the implementation elements and supporting documents named in each initiative-level claim mapping. Does not establish: That the initiative is endorsed by Rotary International or District 9510, that it is permitted by the club's governing documents, that members want it, that it suits the local club, or that it will achieve the intended outcome.
Engage Emerging Leaders Supports: Member-centred discovery, mentoring, feedback, emerging-leader support and club-health review principles during renewal. Does not establish: That a person is ready for office, should be selected, has consented to a role or that a proposed renewal pathway will work locally.
What still needs a person to confirm
Confirm the member, prospective-member, past-member and community needs, preferences and consent that the local design assumes.
Confirm which privacy, safeguarding, incorporated-association, charity, work health and safety, food, liquor, copyright, licensing, screening and other duties apply to the club and the activity.
Test accessibility, cultural safety, belonging, language and alternative participation routes with affected people and recognise First Nations cultural authority rather than inferring suitability from the guide.
Confirm every local fact, starting point, cost, role, current service contact, measure, stopping condition and platform capability before the club decides to proceed.
Confirm the authority and current scope of each primary source, resolve login-gated or moved-page references and keep any candidate District material attributed and unapproved until its source decision is made.
The source-verification release gate remains closed.
Checks still on hold
Confirm local project authorisation, community consultation and partner agreement before listing any first role.
Complete applicable work health and safety, safeguarding, child-safety, insurance, transport, venue and incident requirements.
Confirm expenditure, fundraising, procurement, data, photography, media and brand permissions for each role.
Check that role matching does not expose sensitive information or discriminate on an irrelevant basis.
Name the officer who may stop a role or project when safety, capacity or community value is not adequate.
Still an internal draft: source interpretation, local suitability, accessibility, governance and editorial approval remain open checks.
Made for this initiative
Tailored supporting documents
These working documents use the decisions, safeguards and evidence needs of this initiative. Complete them with the people affected and keep the agreed version with the club's project record.
01
First Project Menu
A dated list of currently available and screened project roles that a new member can compare.