E-023 · Theme 2 · Mentoring & Pathways

Mentorship Spotlights

Use Mentorship Spotlights to make mentoring and personal development easier to find, choose and sustain.

What could this idea change?

It helps knowledge, confidence and encouragement move between members instead of resting with a few people.

It may suit: Members seeking guidance or a new challenge, and the people offering practical support.

A simple way to start

  1. Choose the mentoring behaviour or pathway the series should clarify, write fair selection criteria and identify whose experience is routinely missing from club stories. Who could lead it: Editorial lead with member experience lead
  2. Invite private nominations and self-nominations, approach both participants separately and make clear that declining will not affect recognition, mentoring or future opportunities. Who could lead it: Editorial lead
  3. Agree the intended channel, audience, details, images, expiry and withdrawal route before interviewing, and record any subject that must remain private. Who could lead it: Editorial lead with each participant
  4. Interview each person about the starting question, what each contributed, what changed and what they would do differently; avoid implying that one person rescued or transformed the other. Who could lead it: Interviewer
  5. Return the complete words, headings, image, caption and channel context to both participants, make corrections and publish only the version each person has approved. Who could lead it: Editorial lead and communications approver

What should we look for?

  • After 90 days, review Mentorship Spotlights. Look for suitable matches, regular check-ins and progress against goals chosen by the participating member.
  • Published stories with separate, specific approval from every identifiable participant for the final wording, image, channel and duration.
  • Spotlights representing more than one kind of mentoring, member stage and contribution across the series.
  • Readers who can identify how to request mentoring or explore the featured pathway after seeing the story.
  • Corrections, withdrawals and expiry actions completed within the promised time.

Before we say yes

  • Does it fit a real local need?
  • Can people take part safely and fairly?
  • Are the facts, permissions and Rotary branding right?
  • Who will lead it, and when will we review it?