E-094 · Theme 2 · Intergenerational & Life Stage Support

Family-Friendly Service Projects

More members can contribute without choosing between Rotary and family time.

What could this idea change?

It makes follow-up more caring and consistent, while leaving people in control of how they respond.

It may suit: Members who may welcome support or renewed contact, and the trusted club members following up.

A simple way to start

  1. Ask the authorised partner whether and how family participation would support the project outcome and identify tasks, locations or times that must remain restricted. Who could lead it: Project lead and partner contact
  2. Assess every task and environment for age, safety, safeguarding, access, equipment, amenities, food, weather, supervision and emergency needs and remove unsuitable work. Who could lead it: Safety and safeguarding leads
  3. Invite families with complete conditions, no-pressure and no-image choices and collect only the participant and emergency information genuinely needed. Who could lead it: Participant coordinator
  4. Check in participants, identify adult caregivers, provide age-appropriate briefings and allocate useful tasks within the approved supervision and capacity limits. Who could lead it: Project and task leads
  5. Deliver the project with active supervision, welfare and rest checks, safe equipment, equitable alternatives and no unapproved images, interviews or beneficiary contact. Who could lead it: Task supervisors and safeguarding lead

What should we look for?

  • After 90 days, review Family-Friendly Service Projects. Look for members choosing workable forms of participation and staying connected without pressure to disclose private circumstances.
  • Partner-confirmed useful family roles completed within approved safety and supervision limits.
  • Participants receiving complete conditions, access choices and age-appropriate briefings.
  • No unresolved safety, safeguarding, privacy, food or media issue.
  • Family format continued only when service value and participant safety evidence support it.

Before we say yes

  • Does it fit a real local need?
  • Can people take part safely and fairly?
  • Are the facts, permissions and Rotary branding right?
  • Who will lead it, and when will we review it?