E-122 · Theme 2 · Recognition & Celebrations

Project Team Recognition

Use Project Team Recognition to make recognition timely, genuine and fair across visible and behind-the-scenes contributions.

What could this idea change?

It makes a wider range of contributions visible and strengthens the club's culture of appreciation.

It may suit: Members and volunteers whose contributions may be recognised, and the people nominating or celebrating them.

A simple way to start

  1. Complete the operational and partner closeout before announcing success or recognition. Who could lead it: Project lead and partner contact
  2. Map delivery, preparation, access, administration, partner and follow-up contributions and identify teams or roles that were less visible. Who could lead it: Project and recognition leads
  3. Check workload, safety, conflict and incomplete obligations and move them to separate accountable actions rather than covering them with thanks. Who could lead it: Club board sponsor
  4. Ask contributors and partners how they wish to be recognised and verify names, roles, claims, images and channels. Who could lead it: Recognition contact
  5. Deliver collective and role-based thanks, describe the partner-confirmed outcome and learning and avoid comparison or hero narratives. Who could lead it: Meeting or communications lead

What should we look for?

  • After 90 days, review Project Team Recognition. Look for a wider range of contributions being recognised, with consent, and for recipients reporting that the recognition felt appropriate.
  • Recognition following partner and operational closeout rather than preceding it.
  • Delivery, support, partner and less-visible roles represented without hour rankings.
  • Contributors and partners choosing names, wording, images and channels.
  • Workload, safety and learning actions completed and recognition records closed.

Before we say yes

  • Does it fit a real local need?
  • Can people take part safely and fairly?
  • Are the facts, permissions and Rotary branding right?
  • Who will lead it, and when will we review it?