E-138 · Theme 2 · Past Member Re-Engagement

Alumni Project Funding Circle

Use Alumni Project Funding Circle to offer former members a respectful way to reconnect without assuming that they want to rejoin.

What could this idea change?

It turns member energy into visible, organised action that is easier for other people to join.

It may suit: Former or less-connected members, and the club members reaching out to them.

A simple way to start

  1. Obtain written advice and approvals for the club entity, fundraising jurisdictions, licence or notification, bank, receipts, tax statements, records and any Rotary, district or Foundation requirements. Who could lead it: Club board, treasurer and authorised legal or compliance contact
  2. Approve a circle charter that prohibits pooling, investment, returns, donor influence and grant authority and defines discussion, recommendation, donation and decision roles. Who could lead it: Club board sponsor
  3. Prepare partner-approved project briefs with comparable need, scope, budget, safeguards, evidence, risks, conflicts, contingencies and authorised funding routes. Who could lead it: Project and partner leads
  4. Invite through an authorised route with no-pressure terms, full privacy and conflict information and equal choices to attend, advise, decline or donate nothing. Who could lead it: Authorised alumni and fundraising contacts
  5. Facilitate evidence and conflict review, record questions and recommendations without donor weighting and transfer every money decision and transaction to the authorised club process. Who could lead it: Independent facilitator and treasurer

What should we look for?

  • After 90 days, review Alumni Project Funding Circle. Look for respectful reconnections made with consent, chosen next steps and follow-up that honours people who decline further contact.
  • Written entity, jurisdiction, fundraising, banking, receipt, tax and Rotary approvals completed before solicitation or money handling.
  • Every considered project carrying partner authority, full budget, safeguards, evidence, risks, conflicts and contingency.
  • Participants able to attend, advise, decline or donate nothing without ranking, repeated contact or loss of access.
  • All funds reconciled through the authorised entity and decisions, progress, changes and unused-fund treatment reported on schedule.

Before we say yes

  • Does it fit a real local need?
  • Can people take part safely and fairly?
  • Are the facts, permissions and Rotary branding right?
  • Who will lead it, and when will we review it?