L-022 · A 90-day try-out

A club plan for New Leaders Support Circle

Use this as a starting point. Cross out what does not fit, add what is missing and make it your club's own.

Where this idea came from

Playbook entry
L-022 · New Leaders Support Circle
Theme
Theme 4: Leadership, Culture & Club Experience · Subtheme 2: First-Time Leaders
Source material
Current playbook index title and category plus an internally authored detailed-guide draft

Initiative-specific development wave

How this draft was developed

These sources support general principles for leadership, culture and club experience, accessibility, privacy, safety, systems or responsible governance; they are not an endorsement of New Leaders Support Circle, a finding that it suits any club or approval of its local design.

Primary references consulted

  • Learning & Reference - learn by role (Rotary International - My Rotary)
    Used for: Rotary's current Learning & Reference hub identifies president and committee roles, links role resources and provides access to role-based learning and training materials.
  • Engage emerging leaders (Rotary International)
    Used for: Rotary encourages clubs to assess club health, ask members what they want, take suggestions seriously, support leadership and provide relevant service and learning experiences.
  • Governance for good: A guide for Responsible People (Australian Charities and Not-for-profits Commission)
    Used for: Good governance requires understood roles, authorised decision processes, checks and balances, appropriate delegations, written decisions and oversight of finances and operations.
  • Hosting accessible and inclusive in-person meetings and events (Australian Human Rights Commission)
    Used for: Inclusive in-person events require accessible invitations, venues, transport, formats, technology, activities, adjustments and a clear contact for participant requirements.

Candidate District material

No candidate local guide was used for this version. The current initiative identity and the attributed primary references remain separate.

Theme 4 source-assurance wave

What has been checked

  • 4 current primary pages used by this guide were reopened on 9 August 2026.
  • 4 attributed source claim(s) were mapped to their bounded use in this initiative.
  • Candidate District material remains separate and does not establish this result.
See each source's scope and limit
  • Learning & Reference - learn by role
    Supports: The availability of current Rotary role resources and learning pathways for club and district leadership preparation.
    Does not establish: The duties, delegation, eligibility, appointment method, authority or training completion of a particular person in a particular club.
  • Engage Emerging Leaders
    Supports: Member-centred discovery, mentoring, feedback, emerging-leader support and club-health review principles.
    Does not establish: That a person is ready for office, should be selected, has consented to a role or can exercise authority outside the club's rules.
  • Governance for good: A guide for Responsible People
    Supports: Good-governance principles for roles, delegation, decision processes, records, accountability, financial oversight and organisational purpose.
    Does not establish: That a Rotary club is an ACNC-registered charity, that ACNC duties apply or that a proposed delegation or decision complies with the club's governing documents.
  • Hosting accessible and inclusive in-person meetings and events
    Supports: Practical accessibility and inclusion safeguards for in-person leadership, learning, meetings and events.
    Does not establish: Accessibility conformance, the adjustments a person needs or the suitability of a particular venue, format, activity or event plan.

What still needs a person to confirm

  • Confirm the club's governing documents, election or appointment method, role authority, delegation, budget and reserved decisions before assigning leadership responsibility.
  • Confirm which incorporated-association, charity, work health and safety, privacy, safeguarding and other duties apply to the club and this local design.
  • Test accessibility, workload, belonging and alternative participation routes with affected members rather than inferring suitability from the guide.
  • Confirm every local fact, starting point, measure, cost, owner, capability claim and learning need before the club decides to proceed.
  • Resolve any candidate District-source provenance and approval decision without treating the candidate as controlled authority.

The source-verification release gate remains closed.

Checks still on hold

Still an internal draft: source interpretation, local suitability, accessibility, governance and editorial approval remain open checks.

1. Is this worth trying here?

What we hope will change: Use New Leaders Support Circle to help first-time leaders begin with clear authority, support and realistic expectations.

2. Our 90-day try-out

What our club will do for New Leaders Support Circle
StepWhat we will doWho could lead itOur dateHow we will know it is done
1Write the decision brief for New Leaders Support Circle: define which bounded first role, authority, coach and success evidence a new leader will receive, the starting evidence, people affected, local authority, resource limit, success signals and stop conditions.Board sponsor and leadership-development leadWeek oneAn approved decision and boundary brief
2Publish the capability and decision need, invite interest fairly, ask about access and workload, declare conflicts and separate development from any formal appointment. Apply this specifically to New Leaders Support Circle and record which relevant experiences or users are still missing.Board sponsor and leadership-development lead with the access and privacy contactsWeeks one and twoA participant, access and information-handling plan
3Build and test a facilitated conversation with a published influence boundary and balanced participation for New Leaders Support Circle; complete the New Leaders Support Circle Facilitation and Influence Run Sheet, rehearse the boundary wording and confirm who may decide, refer, pause, recover or close the work.Facilitator, mentor or role supervisorBefore the trialA tested facilitation and influence run sheet and delivery pack
4Use real but bounded practice, observation, reflection and specific feedback; protect confidential information and keep every reserved decision with the authorised office-holder. Capture only the evidence needed to judge whether New Leaders Support Circle advances supported first-time leadership.Facilitator, mentor or role supervisorWeeks three to eightA controlled activity and evidence record
5Compare the evidence with the starting point, validate meaning with affected participants or users, record gaps and unintended effects and prepare a de-identified themes record and response register showing how participant input affected the decision without overstating what the trial proves.Facilitator, mentor or role supervisor with an independent reviewerWithin seven days of the trialA de-identified themes record and response register showing how participant input affected the decision
6Make and record the authorised continue, adapt, refer, scale or stop decision for New Leaders Support Circle; explain the reason, complete every action, close unnecessary records and schedule the 90-day follow-up.Authorised office-holder and handover recipientBy day 90A published participant response, closed action register and next-step decision

3. Checks before we start

Things our club needs to check
QuestionWhat it means for usWho will checkDone?
Check the idea with the people affected and confirm its purpose, owner and practical limits before putting it into use.
Confirm who may decide, how conflicts and decisions will be recorded, and what support a new leader can call on.
The club proceeds with New Leaders Support Circle without respecting this boundary: a development opportunity cannot transfer reserved decisions, confidential access or unlimited workload. — Put the boundary in the brief and participant information, give the delivery lead stop authority and move any excluded matter to its responsible process.
Selection reproduces an inner circle or creates an implied appointment. — Publish the pathway and criteria, invite broadly, declare conflicts and state that formal appointments remain separate.
A learner, mentor or committee exercises authority it does not hold. — Use a written role and delegation, decision checkpoints and an accountable office-holder.
Development creates hidden workload or unnecessary access to confidential information. — Set workload and access limits, provide supervision and use a safe exit and handover.
The current Theme 4 index establishes the code and title. No authoritative detailed Leadership source has been located, so this is explicitly an internally authored, source-referenced draft.
The connected Drive refresh returned an internal error on 9 August 2026. No unseen file was inferred or promoted; the 7 August intake, duplicate decisions, quarantines, rights boundaries and public-write permission hold remain in force and no sharing was changed.
Before local delivery, the club must approve the decision, participant choices, access arrangements, privacy and records plan, role boundaries, referral or escalation routes, resource limit and the specific control for this boundary: a development opportunity cannot transfer reserved decisions, confidential access or unlimited workload.
Formal human review has not started. New Leaders Support Circle remains an internal initiative-specific draft until all 1,000 initiatives reach the Full-Corpus Review Build and every source, editorial, local-suitability, accessibility and governance gate is resolved.

4. What changed?

What we will keep an eye on
What mattersWhere we are nowWhat we hope to seeHow we will checkWho
After 90 days, review New Leaders Support Circle. Look for agreed priorities, regular support, timely decisions and a first-time leader who can explain where to seek help.
New Leaders Support Circle produces a de-identified themes record and response register showing how participant input affected the decision by the promised decision date, with evidence limitations, participation gaps and unintended effects stated.
People affected can explain the purpose, their choices, the boundary and how to raise an access, privacy, safety or governance concern.
The trial shows whether supported first-time leadership improved from the recorded starting point without shifting hidden workload, risk or exclusion elsewhere.
Every accepted action has an owner, due date and completion evidence, and the club records a reasoned continue, adapt, refer, scale or stop decision.

After 30 days

Is it reaching the right people? Is anything unsafe, unfair or harder than expected?

After 60 days

Make one useful change based on what people have told you.

After 90 days

Compare with where you started. Decide whether to change it, continue it or stop.

Made for this initiative

Tailored supporting documents

These working documents use the decisions, safeguards and evidence needs of this initiative. Complete them with the people affected and keep the agreed version with the club's project record.

01

New Leaders Support Circle Capability and Outcome Brief

Define the capability, real work, authority and evidence required.

Open supporting document
02

New Leaders Support Circle Expression of Interest and Conflict Form

Support fair participation and transparent conflict management.

Open supporting document
03

New Leaders Support Circle Role, Authority and Confidentiality Agreement

Keep learning work within approved boundaries.

Open supporting document
04

New Leaders Support Circle Learning and Practice Plan

Turn the capability goal into deliberate work and feedback.

Open supporting document
05

New Leaders Support Circle Observation and Feedback Record

Capture behaviour and impact without personality judgement.

Open supporting document
06

New Leaders Support Circle Decision and Governance Check

Protect formal authority, conflicts and required approvals.

Open supporting document
07

New Leaders Support Circle Handover and Continuity Pack

Transfer work, learning, access and open decisions.

Open supporting document
08

New Leaders Support Circle First-Time Leaders Delivery Check

Test whether New Leaders Support Circle genuinely advances supported first-time leadership within the subtheme boundary.

Open supporting document
09

New Leaders Support Circle Facilitation and Influence Run Sheet

Make the question, participation method, influence and response visible.

Open supporting document
10

New Leaders Support Circle Evidence, Decision and Close-Out Record

Bring the evidence, limitations, participant response and final decision for New Leaders Support Circle into one accountable record.

Open supporting document

Before your club says yes

Does the idea fit?

Talk with the people it is meant to serve and check that the need is real.

Who can say yes?

Name the person or group that can approve the work, spending and any safety arrangements.

Are people protected?

Check privacy, consent and safety. Collect only the information you genuinely need.

Can everyone take part?

Check the language, format, place, technology and cost for barriers.

Are the facts and permissions right?

Check names, claims, images, quotations, partner references and Rotary branding.

How will we learn?

Note where things stand now, check in at 30, 60 and 90 days, and decide what to do next.

Worksheets for your club

Open them online, print them or change them to suit the way your club works.

01

Safety and approval check

Use this worksheet to notice problems early, make the idea safer and know who needs to say yes or help.

Open worksheet
02

Conversation guide

Use this worksheet to hold a respectful conversation, hear different views and tell people what happens next.

Open worksheet
03

Contact register

Use this worksheet to map each step and keep only the information the club genuinely needs.

Open worksheet