M-T1-YS-11 · Detailed guide · Theme 1

Youth Public Speaking Competition

Builds confident, evidence-based speaking through fair heats and useful feedback, without rewarding privilege, inflammatory content or polished performance alone.

Where this idea came from

Playbook entry
M-T1-YS-11 · Youth Public Speaking Competition
Theme
Theme 1: Attraction & Visibility · Subtheme YS: Youth & Schools
Source material
Existing checked Theme 1 guide
Linked playbook entry
M-T1-YS-11 · Youth Public Speaking Competition

Why a club might use this

Young people learn to research, reason and communicate respectfully on issues that matter locally.

Use it when

  • School-nominated young speakers, teachers, families, adjudicators and community audiences. Use when schools want a structured speaking opportunity with transparent judging.

Before the club starts

  • Age divisions, topics, timing, rubric and tie-break process published in advance.
  • School and parent or carer permissions, including separate recording and publicity choices.
  • Content safety process for hate, defamation, distressing disclosure or political advocacy.

Capacity guide

Likely cost
$$ — venue, certificates, access support and adjudicator expenses.
Lead time
8–12 weeks.
People
5–7 members plus school supervisors and 3–5 adjudicators.

How to put it into practice

Detailed implementation steps for Youth Public Speaking Competition
StepActionSuggested owner
1Co-design themes and a rubric that balances reasoning, clarity and respectful engagement.Competition convenor
2Invite schools and collect minimum-entry information through approved channels.School liaison
3Train adjudicators, test timing and confirm accessibility adjustments privately.Chief adjudicator
4Run heats and final with school supervision and consistent conditions.Stage manager
5Return written feedback, announce results and connect participants to further speaking opportunities.Adjudication coordinator

Controls and safeguards

  • Adjudicators declare relationships and do not judge students they coach or know closely.
  • Never livestream, record or publish a minor's speech without explicit consent for that use.
  • HIGH — minors, competitive fairness, sensitive speech and recording consent require written rules and trained adjudicators.

What to measure

  • Schools and eligible speakers participating.

Follow-up: Send private score sheets within five school days; publish only consented results and offer every participant one specific practice pathway.

Related playbook entries

  • M-T1-YS-02
  • M-T1-YS-05
  • M-T1-YS-15

Before your club says yes

Does the idea fit?

Talk with the people it is meant to serve and check that the need is real.

Who can say yes?

Name the person or group that can approve the work, spending and any safety arrangements.

Are people protected?

Check privacy, consent and safety. Collect only the information you genuinely need.

Can everyone take part?

Check the language, format, place, technology and cost for barriers.

Are the facts and permissions right?

Check names, claims, images, quotations, partner references and Rotary branding.

How will we learn?

Note where things stand now, check in at 30, 60 and 90 days, and decide what to do next.