R-116 · Detailed guide · Theme 3

Rotary Re-Engagement Survey

Use Rotary Re-Engagement Survey to create a warm, low-pressure route back for members whose participation has faded.

Where this idea came from

Playbook entry: R-116 · Rotary Re-Engagement Survey
Theme: Theme 3: Retention & Member Support · Subtheme 8: Reconnection Pathways
Source material: Current playbook index title and category plus an internally authored detailed-guide draft

Initiative-specific development wave

How this draft was developed

These sources support general principles for retention and member support, accessibility, privacy, safety, systems or responsible governance; they are not an endorsement of Rotary Re-Engagement Survey, a finding that it suits any club or approval of its local design.

Primary references consulted

Engage emerging leaders (Rotary International)
Used for: Rotary encourages clubs to assess club health, ask members what they want, take suggestions seriously, support leadership and provide relevant service and learning experiences.
Enhance Your Club's Culture (Rotary International)
Used for: Rotary encourages clubs to review traditions, explain costs, offer flexible attendance, support mentoring and vary meeting experiences in response to member needs.
Enhancing Belonging and Engagement at Rotary (Rotary International)
Used for: Rotary identifies belonging, respect, accessibility and equitable access to opportunities, networks and support as central to participation and thriving.
Chapter 3: APP 3 Collection of solicited personal information (Office of the Australian Information Commissioner)
Used for: Personal-information collection should be lawful, fair, proportionate and minimised, with additional controls for sensitive information; each club must confirm how privacy law applies to it.

Candidate District material

No candidate local guide was used for this version. The current initiative identity and the attributed primary references remain separate.

Theme 3 source-assurance wave

What has been checked

4 current primary pages used by this guide were reopened on 9 August 2026.
4 attributed source claim(s) were mapped to their bounded use in this initiative.
Candidate District material remains separate and does not establish this result.

See each source's scope and limit

Engage Emerging Leaders
Supports: Member-centred discovery, mentoring, feedback, emerging-leader support and club-health review principles.
Does not establish: A member's preferences, readiness, consent, wellbeing, support needs or suitability for a role.
Enhance Your Club's Culture
Supports: Member-centred culture review, barrier reduction, flexibility, mentoring and practical conversation about the club experience.
Does not establish: That every suggested action suits the club, that the page diagnoses the club or that a proposed cultural change has member support or approval.
Enhancing Belonging and Engagement at Rotary
Supports: Belonging, accessibility, respectful participation and equitable access principles for retention and member support.
Does not establish: That a particular support pathway, meeting format, relationship or club culture is inclusive without testing with affected people.
Chapter 3: APP 3 Collection of solicited personal information
Supports: Data-minimisation, collection-purpose, proportionality and consent safeguards where the Privacy Act and APP 3 apply.
Does not establish: Whether a club is an APP entity or whether a proposed check-in, wellbeing conversation, survey or member record is lawful in its actual circumstances.

What still needs a person to confirm

Confirm person-led consent, privacy, scope and referral boundaries before the club collects personal information or offers support.
Confirm which incorporated-association, charity, work health and safety, privacy, safeguarding and other duties apply to the club and this local design.
Test accessibility, belonging and participation with affected members rather than inferring suitability from the guide.
Confirm every local fact, starting point, measure, owner, current service contact and stopping condition before the club decides to proceed.
Resolve any candidate District-source provenance and approval decision without treating the candidate as controlled authority.

The source-verification release gate remains closed.

Checks still on hold

The current Theme 3 index establishes the code and title. Placeholder-heavy Theme 3 Drive candidates remain quarantined and were not used as initiative evidence.
The connected Drive refresh returned an internal error on 9 August 2026. No unseen file was inferred or promoted; the 7 August intake, duplicate decisions, quarantines, rights boundaries and public-write permission hold remain in force and no sharing was changed.
Before local delivery, the club must approve the decision, participant choices, access arrangements, privacy and records plan, role boundaries, referral or escalation routes, resource limit and the specific control for this boundary: reconnection must never become repeated contact, a loyalty test or an assumption that returning is the preferred outcome.
Formal human review has not started. Rotary Re-Engagement Survey remains an internal initiative-specific draft until all 1,000 initiatives reach the Full-Corpus Review Build and every source, editorial, local-suitability, accessibility and governance gate is resolved.

Still an internal draft: source interpretation, local suitability, accessibility, governance and editorial approval remain open checks.

Why a club might use this

It gives the club a clearer view of people's experiences before decisions are made, including feedback that informal conversations can miss.

It may suit: Former or less-connected members, and the club members reaching out to them.

Use it when

Consider Rotary Re-Engagement Survey when a member has become less connected and the club can approach them with care rather than assumptions.
A club where members need a respectful, practical change that supports continued participation, renewed connection, learning or meaningful influence.
A club with a real need for respectful reconnection and capacity to support a bounded evidence review with defined inputs, participation gaps and interpretation limits.
A 90-day trial of Rotary Re-Engagement Survey with a starting point, named participants, a resource ceiling and a scheduled continue, adapt or stop decision.

Before the club starts

A board-approved brief naming which former, quieter or less-active members may be invited to reconnect and what choice they retain, the local authority, people affected, fixed constraints, resource ceiling, decision date and stop conditions.
A starting-point record and participant plan suited to a bounded evidence review with defined inputs, participation gaps and interpretation limits, with accessible information, voluntary choices and a supported alternative route where needed.
Named delivery, evidence and decision owners, including a person authorised to pause Rotary Re-Engagement Survey when a safeguard, permission or boundary is not met.
A proportionate check of governing documents, privacy, information security, accessibility, conflicts, safeguarding, work health and safety, records, finance and referral duties for the actual local design.

Capacity guide

Likely cost: Low; usually personal contact and access to an existing club activity.
Lead time: About three weeks for review, contact and the first reconnection step.
People: Two to four people, with one coordinator and carefully chosen personal connectors.

A useful club conversation

Questions worth asking

Whose experience, authority, access or safety could be missed if Rotary Re-Engagement Survey is designed only by regular attendees, confident digital users or current leaders?
What would make a dated findings summary that separates facts, experience, assumptions and unanswered questions credible enough for the club's decision, and what would still remain uncertain?
What local adaptation would still respect this boundary: Reconnection must never become repeated contact, a loyalty test or an assumption that returning is the preferred outcome.

Common traps

Trying Rotary Re-Engagement Survey when A club with no open decision, no accountable owner, no capacity to act on a dated findings summary that separates facts, experience, assumptions and unanswered questions or no safe way to pause the trial.
Proceeding with Rotary Re-Engagement Survey when Rotary Re-Engagement Survey must not be used for an attempt to pressure attendance, diagnose a person, conceal a complaint or replace a responsible wellbeing, safeguarding or governance process. Reconnection must never become repeated contact, a loyalty test or an assumption that returning is the preferred outcome.
The club gathers stories or personal circumstances that are not needed for its decision. — Minimise collection, separate private matters, restrict access and close or delete records under the approved plan.

A practical 90-day path

Three milestones for Rotary Re-Engagement Survey
When	What the club does	Evidence to keep
Days 1–30: Agree the local design	Write the decision brief for Rotary Re-Engagement Survey: define which former, quieter or less-active members may be invited to reconnect and what choice they retain, the starting evidence, people affected, local authority, resource limit, success signals and stop conditions. Invite people across tenure and participation patterns, make involvement voluntary, offer accessible and non-digital routes, state what is open or fixed and protect private circumstances. Apply this specifically to Rotary Re-Engagement Survey and record which relevant experiences or users are still missing.	An approved decision and boundary brief A participant, access and information-handling plan
Days 31–60: Run and adjust the first version	Build and test a bounded evidence review with defined inputs, participation gaps and interpretation limits for Rotary Re-Engagement Survey; complete the Rotary Re-Engagement Survey Diagnostic Evidence Matrix, rehearse the boundary wording and confirm who may decide, refer, pause, recover or close the work. Use a bounded, permission-led trial; keep interpretation with participants, record exceptions as well as successes and transfer any private, urgent or specialist matter to its responsible pathway. Capture only the evidence needed to judge whether Rotary Re-Engagement Survey advances respectful reconnection.	A tested diagnostic evidence matrix and delivery pack A controlled activity and evidence record
Days 61–90: Review the evidence and decide	Compare the evidence with the starting point, validate meaning with affected participants or users, record gaps and unintended effects and prepare a dated findings summary that separates facts, experience, assumptions and unanswered questions without overstating what the trial proves. Make and record the authorised continue, adapt, refer, scale or stop decision for Rotary Re-Engagement Survey; explain the reason, complete every action, close unnecessary records and schedule the 90-day follow-up.	A dated findings summary that separates facts, experience, assumptions and unanswered questions A published participant response, closed action register and next-step decision

Fit it to the club you have

Small club

Use an external facilitator or district support person when close relationships make privacy, candour or role separation difficult. Apply this specifically to Rotary Re-Engagement Survey, a bounded evidence review with defined inputs, participation gaps and interpretation limits and the club's actual capacity.

Larger club

Use several hosts under one brief, common safeguards and one controlled evidence and decision register. Apply this specifically to Rotary Re-Engagement Survey, a bounded evidence review with defined inputs, participation gaps and interpretation limits and the club's actual capacity.

Regional or rural club

Offer telephone, paper and low-bandwidth routes, plan around travel and seasonal work and suppress results that could identify someone in a close community. Apply this specifically to Rotary Re-Engagement Survey, a bounded evidence review with defined inputs, participation gaps and interpretation limits and the club's actual capacity.

Metropolitan, hybrid or online club

Offer several times and formats, captions and accessible materials, plus an equivalent non-digital route and an active participation-gap check. Apply this specifically to Rotary Re-Engagement Survey, a bounded evidence review with defined inputs, participation gaps and interpretation limits and the club's actual capacity.

Learn, adapt and know when to stop

Evidence worth keeping

Rotary Re-Engagement Survey produces a dated findings summary that separates facts, experience, assumptions and unanswered questions by the promised decision date, with evidence limitations, participation gaps and unintended effects stated.
People affected can explain the purpose, their choices, the boundary and how to raise an access, privacy, safety or governance concern.
The trial shows whether respectful reconnection improved from the recorded starting point without shifting hidden workload, risk or exclusion elsewhere.

Change course when

The club proceeds with Rotary Re-Engagement Survey without respecting this boundary: reconnection must never become repeated contact, a loyalty test or an assumption that returning is the preferred outcome. — Put the boundary in the brief and participant information, give the delivery lead stop authority and move any excluded matter to its responsible process.
The same regular members define the need and the answer. — Recruit across tenure, attendance and contribution patterns and record who was missed.
A supportive activity becomes pressure, surveillance or informal case management. — Use voluntary contact choices, written role boundaries, referral routes and an immediate pause when the boundary is crossed.

How to put it into practice

Detailed implementation steps for Rotary Re-Engagement Survey
Step	Action	Suggested owner	Timing	Evidence or output
1	Write the decision brief for Rotary Re-Engagement Survey: define which former, quieter or less-active members may be invited to reconnect and what choice they retain, the starting evidence, people affected, local authority, resource limit, success signals and stop conditions.	Board sponsor and member-experience lead	Week one	An approved decision and boundary brief
2	Invite people across tenure and participation patterns, make involvement voluntary, offer accessible and non-digital routes, state what is open or fixed and protect private circumstances. Apply this specifically to Rotary Re-Engagement Survey and record which relevant experiences or users are still missing.	Board sponsor and member-experience lead with the access and privacy contacts	Weeks one and two	A participant, access and information-handling plan
3	Build and test a bounded evidence review with defined inputs, participation gaps and interpretation limits for Rotary Re-Engagement Survey; complete the Rotary Re-Engagement Survey Diagnostic Evidence Matrix, rehearse the boundary wording and confirm who may decide, refer, pause, recover or close the work.	Initiative host and evidence custodian	Before the trial	A tested diagnostic evidence matrix and delivery pack
4	Use a bounded, permission-led trial; keep interpretation with participants, record exceptions as well as successes and transfer any private, urgent or specialist matter to its responsible pathway. Capture only the evidence needed to judge whether Rotary Re-Engagement Survey advances respectful reconnection.	Initiative host and evidence custodian	Weeks three to eight	A controlled activity and evidence record
5	Compare the evidence with the starting point, validate meaning with affected participants or users, record gaps and unintended effects and prepare a dated findings summary that separates facts, experience, assumptions and unanswered questions without overstating what the trial proves.	Initiative host and evidence custodian with an independent reviewer	Within seven days of the trial	A dated findings summary that separates facts, experience, assumptions and unanswered questions
6	Make and record the authorised continue, adapt, refer, scale or stop decision for Rotary Re-Engagement Survey; explain the reason, complete every action, close unnecessary records and schedule the 90-day follow-up.	Authorised decision owner and follow-up lead	By day 90	A published participant response, closed action register and next-step decision

Controls and safeguards

Check the idea with the people affected and confirm its purpose, owner and practical limits before putting it into use.
Use only the personal information needed. Agree who will handle routine care and who should be contacted if a serious concern arises.
Collect only necessary data, state its purpose and retention, restrict access and provide a practical correction or withdrawal route.
The club proceeds with Rotary Re-Engagement Survey without respecting this boundary: reconnection must never become repeated contact, a loyalty test or an assumption that returning is the preferred outcome. — Put the boundary in the brief and participant information, give the delivery lead stop authority and move any excluded matter to its responsible process.
The same regular members define the need and the answer. — Recruit across tenure, attendance and contribution patterns and record who was missed.
A supportive activity becomes pressure, surveillance or informal case management. — Use voluntary contact choices, written role boundaries, referral routes and an immediate pause when the boundary is crossed.
The club gathers stories or personal circumstances that are not needed for its decision. — Minimise collection, separate private matters, restrict access and close or delete records under the approved plan.
The current Theme 3 index establishes the code and title. Placeholder-heavy Theme 3 Drive candidates remain quarantined and were not used as initiative evidence.
The connected Drive refresh returned an internal error on 9 August 2026. No unseen file was inferred or promoted; the 7 August intake, duplicate decisions, quarantines, rights boundaries and public-write permission hold remain in force and no sharing was changed.
Before local delivery, the club must approve the decision, participant choices, access arrangements, privacy and records plan, role boundaries, referral or escalation routes, resource limit and the specific control for this boundary: reconnection must never become repeated contact, a loyalty test or an assumption that returning is the preferred outcome.

What to measure

After 90 days, review Rotary Re-Engagement Survey. Look for respectful contact, the member's preferences being recorded and any chosen reconnection being followed through.
Rotary Re-Engagement Survey produces a dated findings summary that separates facts, experience, assumptions and unanswered questions by the promised decision date, with evidence limitations, participation gaps and unintended effects stated.
People affected can explain the purpose, their choices, the boundary and how to raise an access, privacy, safety or governance concern.
The trial shows whether respectful reconnection improved from the recorded starting point without shifting hidden workload, risk or exclusion elsewhere.
Every accepted action has an owner, due date and completion evidence, and the club records a reasoned continue, adapt, refer, scale or stop decision.

Follow-up: At the 90-day review, compare the recorded measures with the starting point, resolve the listed governance holds and tell participants whether Rotary Re-Engagement Survey will change, continue or stop.

Made for this initiative

Tailored supporting documents

These working documents use the decisions, safeguards and evidence needs of this initiative. Complete them with the people affected and keep the agreed version with the club's project record.

Rotary Re-Engagement Survey Decision and Member-Experience Brief

Define the change, decision, participant choices and limits before work begins.

Open supporting document

Rotary Re-Engagement Survey Participation and Access Plan

Reach relevant members without making one format or attendance pattern the default.

Open supporting document

Rotary Re-Engagement Survey Host Conversation and Boundary Script

Support consistent, humane contact without pressure or role drift.

Open supporting document

Rotary Re-Engagement Survey Trial Run Sheet

Coordinate a safe first version with clear responsibilities.

Open supporting document

Rotary Re-Engagement Survey Minimal Evidence Log

Retain only the evidence needed for the decision and follow-up.

Open supporting document

Rotary Re-Engagement Survey Response and Follow-Up Register

Make the club's response visible and close every accepted action.

Open supporting document

Rotary Re-Engagement Survey Reconnection Pathways Delivery Check

Test whether Rotary Re-Engagement Survey genuinely advances respectful reconnection within the subtheme boundary.

Open supporting document

Rotary Re-Engagement Survey Diagnostic Evidence Matrix

Compare the initiative's inputs consistently without turning a signal into a verdict.

Open supporting document

Rotary Re-Engagement Survey Evidence, Decision and Close-Out Record

Bring the evidence, limitations, participant response and final decision for Rotary Re-Engagement Survey into one accountable record.

Open supporting document

Related playbook entries

R-115
R-117

Supporting worksheets

Before your club says yes

Does the idea fit?

Talk with the people it is meant to serve and check that the need is real.

We have checked this

Who can say yes?

Name the person or group that can approve the work, spending and any safety arrangements.

We have checked this

Are people protected?

Check privacy, consent and safety. Collect only the information you genuinely need.

We have checked this

Can everyone take part?

Check the language, format, place, technology and cost for barriers.

We have checked this

Are the facts and permissions right?

Check names, claims, images, quotations, partner references and Rotary branding.

We have checked this

How will we learn?

Note where things stand now, check in at 30, 60 and 90 days, and decide what to do next.

We have checked this