R-119 · A 90-day try-out

A club plan for Rotary Return Pathway Mentoring

Use this as a starting point. Cross out what does not fit, add what is missing and make it your club's own.

Where this idea came from

Playbook entry: R-119 · Rotary Return Pathway Mentoring
Theme: Theme 3: Retention & Member Support · Subtheme 8: Reconnection Pathways
Source material: Current playbook index title and category plus an internally authored detailed-guide draft

Initiative-specific development wave

How this draft was developed

These sources support general principles for retention and member support, accessibility, privacy, safety, systems or responsible governance; they are not an endorsement of Rotary Return Pathway Mentoring, a finding that it suits any club or approval of its local design.

Primary references consulted

Engage emerging leaders (Rotary International)
Used for: Rotary encourages clubs to assess club health, ask members what they want, take suggestions seriously, support leadership and provide relevant service and learning experiences.
Enhance Your Club's Culture (Rotary International)
Used for: Rotary encourages clubs to review traditions, explain costs, offer flexible attendance, support mentoring and vary meeting experiences in response to member needs.
Enhancing Belonging and Engagement at Rotary (Rotary International)
Used for: Rotary identifies belonging, respect, accessibility and equitable access to opportunities, networks and support as central to participation and thriving.
Chapter 3: APP 3 Collection of solicited personal information (Office of the Australian Information Commissioner)
Used for: Personal-information collection should be lawful, fair, proportionate and minimised, with additional controls for sensitive information; each club must confirm how privacy law applies to it.

Candidate District material

No candidate local guide was used for this version. The current initiative identity and the attributed primary references remain separate.

Theme 3 source-assurance wave

What has been checked

4 current primary pages used by this guide were reopened on 9 August 2026.
4 attributed source claim(s) were mapped to their bounded use in this initiative.
Candidate District material remains separate and does not establish this result.

See each source's scope and limit

Engage Emerging Leaders
Supports: Member-centred discovery, mentoring, feedback, emerging-leader support and club-health review principles.
Does not establish: A member's preferences, readiness, consent, wellbeing, support needs or suitability for a role.
Enhance Your Club's Culture
Supports: Member-centred culture review, barrier reduction, flexibility, mentoring and practical conversation about the club experience.
Does not establish: That every suggested action suits the club, that the page diagnoses the club or that a proposed cultural change has member support or approval.
Enhancing Belonging and Engagement at Rotary
Supports: Belonging, accessibility, respectful participation and equitable access principles for retention and member support.
Does not establish: That a particular support pathway, meeting format, relationship or club culture is inclusive without testing with affected people.
Chapter 3: APP 3 Collection of solicited personal information
Supports: Data-minimisation, collection-purpose, proportionality and consent safeguards where the Privacy Act and APP 3 apply.
Does not establish: Whether a club is an APP entity or whether a proposed check-in, wellbeing conversation, survey or member record is lawful in its actual circumstances.

What still needs a person to confirm

Confirm person-led consent, privacy, scope and referral boundaries before the club collects personal information or offers support.
Confirm which incorporated-association, charity, work health and safety, privacy, safeguarding and other duties apply to the club and this local design.
Test accessibility, belonging and participation with affected members rather than inferring suitability from the guide.
Confirm every local fact, starting point, measure, owner, current service contact and stopping condition before the club decides to proceed.
Resolve any candidate District-source provenance and approval decision without treating the candidate as controlled authority.

The source-verification release gate remains closed.

Checks still on hold

The current Theme 3 index establishes the code and title. Placeholder-heavy Theme 3 Drive candidates remain quarantined and were not used as initiative evidence.
The connected Drive refresh returned an internal error on 9 August 2026. No unseen file was inferred or promoted; the 7 August intake, duplicate decisions, quarantines, rights boundaries and public-write permission hold remain in force and no sharing was changed.
Before local delivery, the club must approve the decision, participant choices, access arrangements, privacy and records plan, role boundaries, referral or escalation routes, resource limit and the specific control for this boundary: reconnection must never become repeated contact, a loyalty test or an assumption that returning is the preferred outcome.
Formal human review has not started. Rotary Return Pathway Mentoring remains an internal initiative-specific draft until all 1,000 initiatives reach the Full-Corpus Review Build and every source, editorial, local-suitability, accessibility and governance gate is resolved.

Still an internal draft: source interpretation, local suitability, accessibility, governance and editorial approval remain open checks.

1. Is this worth trying here?

What we hope will change: Use Rotary Return Pathway Mentoring to create a warm, low-pressure route back for members whose participation has faded.

What is happening in our club or community now?What is the smallest useful version we could try? What will we leave out?

Board contactPerson leading the workPerson checking what happened

2. Our 90-day try-out

What our club will do for Rotary Return Pathway Mentoring
Step	What we will do	Who could lead it	Our date	How we will know it is done
1	Write the decision brief for Rotary Return Pathway Mentoring: define which former, quieter or less-active members may be invited to reconnect and what choice they retain, the starting evidence, people affected, local authority, resource limit, success signals and stop conditions.	Board sponsor and member-experience lead	Week one	An approved decision and boundary brief
2	Invite people across tenure and participation patterns, make involvement voluntary, offer accessible and non-digital routes, state what is open or fixed and protect private circumstances. Apply this specifically to Rotary Return Pathway Mentoring and record which relevant experiences or users are still missing.	Board sponsor and member-experience lead with the access and privacy contacts	Weeks one and two	A participant, access and information-handling plan
3	Build and test a consent-based capability partnership with a defined goal, boundaries, practice and planned ending for Rotary Return Pathway Mentoring; complete the Rotary Return Pathway Mentoring Compact and Session Record, rehearse the boundary wording and confirm who may decide, refer, pause, recover or close the work.	Initiative host and evidence custodian	Before the trial	A tested mentoring compact and session record and delivery pack
4	Use a bounded, permission-led trial; keep interpretation with participants, record exceptions as well as successes and transfer any private, urgent or specialist matter to its responsible pathway. Capture only the evidence needed to judge whether Rotary Return Pathway Mentoring advances respectful reconnection.	Initiative host and evidence custodian	Weeks three to eight	A controlled activity and evidence record
5	Compare the evidence with the starting point, validate meaning with affected participants or users, record gaps and unintended effects and prepare a participant-owned capability record and a clear continue, change or close decision without overstating what the trial proves.	Initiative host and evidence custodian with an independent reviewer	Within seven days of the trial	A participant-owned capability record and a clear continue, change or close decision
6	Make and record the authorised continue, adapt, refer, scale or stop decision for Rotary Return Pathway Mentoring; explain the reason, complete every action, close unnecessary records and schedule the 90-day follow-up.	Authorised decision owner and follow-up lead	By day 90	A published participant response, closed action register and next-step decision

3. Checks before we start

Things our club needs to check
Question	What it means for us	Who will check	Done?
Check the idea with the people affected and confirm its purpose, owner and practical limits before putting it into use.
Use only the personal information needed. Agree who will handle routine care and who should be contacted if a serious concern arises.
The club proceeds with Rotary Return Pathway Mentoring without respecting this boundary: reconnection must never become repeated contact, a loyalty test or an assumption that returning is the preferred outcome. — Put the boundary in the brief and participant information, give the delivery lead stop authority and move any excluded matter to its responsible process.
The same regular members define the need and the answer. — Recruit across tenure, attendance and contribution patterns and record who was missed.
A supportive activity becomes pressure, surveillance or informal case management. — Use voluntary contact choices, written role boundaries, referral routes and an immediate pause when the boundary is crossed.
The club gathers stories or personal circumstances that are not needed for its decision. — Minimise collection, separate private matters, restrict access and close or delete records under the approved plan.
The current Theme 3 index establishes the code and title. Placeholder-heavy Theme 3 Drive candidates remain quarantined and were not used as initiative evidence.
The connected Drive refresh returned an internal error on 9 August 2026. No unseen file was inferred or promoted; the 7 August intake, duplicate decisions, quarantines, rights boundaries and public-write permission hold remain in force and no sharing was changed.
Before local delivery, the club must approve the decision, participant choices, access arrangements, privacy and records plan, role boundaries, referral or escalation routes, resource limit and the specific control for this boundary: reconnection must never become repeated contact, a loyalty test or an assumption that returning is the preferred outcome.
Formal human review has not started. Rotary Return Pathway Mentoring remains an internal initiative-specific draft until all 1,000 initiatives reach the Full-Corpus Review Build and every source, editorial, local-suitability, accessibility and governance gate is resolved.

4. What changed?

What we will keep an eye on
What matters	Where we are now	What we hope to see	How we will check	Who
After 90 days, review Rotary Return Pathway Mentoring. Look for respectful contact, the member's preferences being recorded and any chosen reconnection being followed through.
Rotary Return Pathway Mentoring produces a participant-owned capability record and a clear continue, change or close decision by the promised decision date, with evidence limitations, participation gaps and unintended effects stated.
People affected can explain the purpose, their choices, the boundary and how to raise an access, privacy, safety or governance concern.
The trial shows whether respectful reconnection improved from the recorded starting point without shifting hidden workload, risk or exclusion elsewhere.
Every accepted action has an owner, due date and completion evidence, and the club records a reasoned continue, adapt, refer, scale or stop decision.

After 30 days

Is it reaching the right people? Is anything unsafe, unfair or harder than expected?

After 60 days

Make one useful change based on what people have told you.

After 90 days

Compare with where you started. Decide whether to change it, continue it or stop.

Made for this initiative

Tailored supporting documents

These working documents use the decisions, safeguards and evidence needs of this initiative. Complete them with the people affected and keep the agreed version with the club's project record.

Rotary Return Pathway Mentoring Decision and Member-Experience Brief

Define the change, decision, participant choices and limits before work begins.

Open supporting document

Rotary Return Pathway Mentoring Participation and Access Plan

Reach relevant members without making one format or attendance pattern the default.

Open supporting document

Rotary Return Pathway Mentoring Host Conversation and Boundary Script

Support consistent, humane contact without pressure or role drift.

Open supporting document

Rotary Return Pathway Mentoring Trial Run Sheet

Coordinate a safe first version with clear responsibilities.

Open supporting document

Rotary Return Pathway Mentoring Minimal Evidence Log

Retain only the evidence needed for the decision and follow-up.

Open supporting document

Rotary Return Pathway Mentoring Response and Follow-Up Register

Make the club's response visible and close every accepted action.

Open supporting document

Rotary Return Pathway Mentoring Reconnection Pathways Delivery Check

Test whether Rotary Return Pathway Mentoring genuinely advances respectful reconnection within the subtheme boundary.

Open supporting document

Rotary Return Pathway Mentoring Compact and Session Record

Keep expectations, authority, privacy, feedback and closure explicit.

Open supporting document

Rotary Return Pathway Mentoring Evidence, Decision and Close-Out Record

Bring the evidence, limitations, participant response and final decision for Rotary Return Pathway Mentoring into one accountable record.

Open supporting document

Before your club says yes

Does the idea fit?

Talk with the people it is meant to serve and check that the need is real.

We have checked this

Who can say yes?

Name the person or group that can approve the work, spending and any safety arrangements.

We have checked this

Are people protected?

Check privacy, consent and safety. Collect only the information you genuinely need.

We have checked this

Can everyone take part?

Check the language, format, place, technology and cost for barriers.

We have checked this

Are the facts and permissions right?

Check names, claims, images, quotations, partner references and Rotary branding.

We have checked this

How will we learn?

Note where things stand now, check in at 30, 60 and 90 days, and decide what to do next.

We have checked this

Worksheets for your club

Open them online, print them or change them to suit the way your club works.

Roadmap

Use this worksheet to turn the idea into a short list of actions, dates, costs and responsibilities.

Open worksheet

Are we ready to try this?

Use this worksheet to decide whether a small first try is realistic and what the club must settle before it starts.

Open worksheet

Progress tracker

Use this worksheet to note where things stand and choose a few useful signs that will help the club decide what to do next.

Open worksheet