| 1 | Ask members what kinds of connection would be enjoyable and accessible, then choose one modest social outcome and several equivalent contribution categories. | Challenge sponsor and member-experience lead | Eight weeks before the month | A member-informed challenge purpose and participation map |
| 2 | Draft the charter, team method, scoring cap, privacy position, safety boundaries, adjustment route and clear distinction between activity tallies and verified Rotary impact. | Challenge coordinator and governance lead | Six weeks before the month | An approved challenge charter and data plan |
| 3 | Test every suggested activity with members of different abilities, schedules, locations and digital access, replacing options that are costly, unsafe or difficult to adapt. | Access and safety leads | Four weeks before the month | A tested activity menu with equivalent alternatives |
| 4 | Form balanced teams without publishing personal profiles, brief team contacts and let each participant choose a contribution, support or ordinary-attendance route. | Team liaison | Two weeks before the month | Consent-based teams and private adjustment choices |
| 5 | Share weekly team totals and stories only within the agreed scope, check workload and access, stop unsafe activity and prevent competitive pressure or exaggerated service claims. | Challenge coordinator and team contacts | During the month | A moderated progress record and issue log |
| 6 | Close with a short social celebration, recognise varied contributions, delete unnecessary individual data and decide whether the challenge improved connection enough to repeat. | Club president and evaluation lead | Within seven days of completion | A collective celebration and evidence-based repeat decision |