E-112 · Theme 2 · Recognition & Celebrations
Member Thank-You Note Program
Members receive specific appreciation soon after their effort and feel their contribution was noticed.
Developed further: this summary now draws on an initiative-specific internal editorial draft and attributed references. Human review has not started and will open only at the Full-Corpus Review Build.
What could this idea change?
It makes a wider range of contributions visible and strengthens the club's culture of appreciation.
It may suit: Members and volunteers whose contributions may be recognised, and the people nominating or celebrating them.
A simple way to start
- Approve the purpose, note guide, exclusions, moderation, complaint route, delivery, publicity and deletion rules. Who could lead it: Program lead and club board sponsor
- Provide accessible physical and digital note options with examples of specific appreciation and clear advice not to include complaints or private information. Who could lead it: Program and access leads
- Screen each note for harmful, confidential, commercial or complaint content and move concerns to the correct separate process without forwarding the message. Who could lead it: Designated moderator
- Deliver the note privately and let the recipient choose whether the sender is disclosed, a reply is enabled or any public use is considered. Who could lead it: Program lead
- Obtain specific fresh permission from sender and recipient before reading, displaying, photographing or publishing any note. Who could lead it: Communications lead
What should we look for?
- After 90 days, review Member Thank-You Note Program. Look for a wider range of contributions being recognised, with consent, and for recipients reporting that the recognition felt appropriate.
- Notes naming a specific contribution and why it helped.
- Harmful, complaint and confidential content withheld and correctly redirected.
- Recipients controlling attribution, response, public use and deletion.
- No rankings produced and message copies deleted on schedule.
Before we say yes
- Does it fit a real local need?
- Can people take part safely and fairly?
- Are the facts, permissions and Rotary branding right?
- Who will lead it, and when will we review it?
