M-T1-BV-17 · Detailed guide · Theme 1

Executive Leadership Breakfast

Uses a small, confidential breakfast to secure senior cross-organisation decisions on one community priority, with each attendee chosen for a relevant lever rather than status.

Where this idea came from

Playbook entry
M-T1-BV-17 · Executive Leadership Breakfast
Theme
Theme 1: Attraction & Visibility · Subtheme BV: Business Visibility
Source material
Existing checked Theme 1 guide
Linked playbook entry
M-T1-BV-17 · Executive Leadership Breakfast

Why a club might use this

A time-sensitive issue gains coordinated executive decisions and resource commitments without a large public event.

Use it when

  • Chief executives, senior public or community leaders and the accountable owner of a defined local priority. Use when the decision requires senior authority from a small number of organisations.

Before the club starts

  • One-page decision brief, options and non-negotiable community safeguards.
  • Participant conflicts, authority and confidentiality or attribution convention confirmed.
  • Accessible venue and documented decision recorder.

Capacity guide

Likely cost
$$ — high-quality briefing, accessible private venue and facilitation.
Lead time
6–8 weeks.
People
3–4 organisers plus independent chair, priority owner and 6–10 executives.

How to put it into practice

Detailed implementation steps for Executive Leadership Breakfast
StepActionSuggested owner
1Name the decision and invite only leaders controlling a relevant lever.Executive convenor
2Pre-brief participants and collect conflicts plus decision constraints.Secretariat
3Open with the community owner's evidence and requested outcome.Priority owner
4Facilitate decisions, dependencies and named commitments within 75 minutes.Independent chair
5Confirm the record bilaterally and begin delivery immediately.Accountability secretary

Controls and safeguards

  • Confidentiality does not conceal conflicts, unlawful conduct or agreed public accountability.
  • No procurement, political donation, grant or regulatory favour is discussed as consideration.
  • HIGH — concentrated influence, conflicts, confidentiality and quid-pro-quo perception demand careful invitations and a controlled decision record.

What to measure

  • Required decision-makers attending with authority.

Follow-up: Confirm the decision record within 24 hours and issue private weekly delivery checks until each commitment is complete or escalated.

Related playbook entries

  • M-T1-BV-01
  • M-T1-BV-04
  • M-T1-BV-21

Before your club says yes

Does the idea fit?

Talk with the people it is meant to serve and check that the need is real.

Who can say yes?

Name the person or group that can approve the work, spending and any safety arrangements.

Are people protected?

Check privacy, consent and safety. Collect only the information you genuinely need.

Can everyone take part?

Check the language, format, place, technology and cost for barriers.

Are the facts and permissions right?

Check names, claims, images, quotations, partner references and Rotary branding.

How will we learn?

Note where things stand now, check in at 30, 60 and 90 days, and decide what to do next.