M-T1-CL-07 · Detailed guide · Theme 1

Community Strategy Workshop

Moves a defined community priority from shared evidence to a short, owned strategy by making choices, trade-offs, authority, measures and review points explicit in the room.

Where this idea came from

Playbook entry
M-T1-CL-07 · Community Strategy Workshop
Theme
Theme 1: Attraction & Visibility · Subtheme CL: Civic Leadership
Source material
Existing checked Theme 1 guide
Linked playbook entry
M-T1-CL-07 · Community Strategy Workshop

Why a club might use this

Participants can see how their input affects priorities and leave with a realistic action framework instead of an unranked list of aspirations.

Use it when

  • Affected residents, community organisations, delivery partners, funders, technical advisers and authorities relevant to the priority. Use when the issue has enough evidence and stakeholder readiness to move from listening into choices.

Before the club starts

  • A pre-work brief summarising evidence, prior engagement, constraints, existing commitments and open decisions.
  • Participant and power map, facilitation plan, access supports and conflict declarations.
  • A strategy template covering outcome, principles, options, actions, owners, resources, measures, risks and review.

Capacity guide

Likely cost
$$
Lead time
6-10 weeks
People
6-12 facilitation, evidence and stakeholder contributors

How to put it into practice

Detailed implementation steps for Community Strategy Workshop
StepActionSuggested owner
1Confirm the priority, decision boundary and evidence with participants before strategy generation.Strategy Sponsor
2Surface stakeholder needs, assets, constraints and non-negotiable rights through structured exercises.Lead Facilitator
3Generate and assess strategic options against community value, feasibility, equity, risk and authority.Workshop Participants
4Draft the minimum coherent strategy with accepted owners, dependencies, measures and review triggers.Strategy Scribe
5Validate the draft with absent stakeholders and secure formal acceptance only from authorised organisations.Strategy Steward

Controls and safeguards

  • Do not describe workshop participation as community mandate or organisational approval; record who attended, who was absent and who can decide.
  • Facilitation must protect under-heard voices and manage sponsor, official, funder and expert power without forcing consensus.
  • HIGH - false mandate, forced consensus, power imbalance and unaccepted actions can make a workshop strategy unusable.

What to measure

  • Decision-relevant stakeholders contributing

Follow-up: Issue the accessible draft within seven days, run a fixed validation window and publish the accepted strategy with an explicit status for every unowned or disputed action.

Related playbook entries

  • M-T1-CL-10
  • M-T1-CP-12
  • M-T1-SP-05

Before your club says yes

Does the idea fit?

Talk with the people it is meant to serve and check that the need is real.

Who can say yes?

Name the person or group that can approve the work, spending and any safety arrangements.

Are people protected?

Check privacy, consent and safety. Collect only the information you genuinely need.

Can everyone take part?

Check the language, format, place, technology and cost for barriers.

Are the facts and permissions right?

Check names, claims, images, quotations, partner references and Rotary branding.

How will we learn?

Note where things stand now, check in at 30, 60 and 90 days, and decide what to do next.