E-079 · Theme 2 · Member Roles & Purpose
Project Reverse Pitch Night
Use Project Reverse Pitch Night to connect members' strengths and interests with worthwhile roles that have clear boundaries.
Developed further: this summary now draws on an initiative-specific internal editorial draft and attributed references. Human review has not started and will open only at the Full-Corpus Review Build.
What could this idea change?
It creates a welcoming reason for people to connect around a shared interest and leave with a clear next step.
It may suit: Members, guests or community participants who would find the topic useful, and the people hosting the activity.
A simple way to start
- Confirm which projects and roles are approved or decision-ready, remove those with unresolved authority or safety conditions and identify a small first step for each remaining opportunity. Who could lead it: Club board delegate and project leads
- Complete and peer-check one role pitch per opportunity covering community purpose, actual tasks, time, term, location, support, authority, access, costs and conditions. Who could lead it: Project leads and member-experience lead
- Publish the session promise, opportunity summaries, access choices and private expression-of-interest route, making clear that attendance and interest create no obligation. Who could lead it: Session host and access contact
- Run tightly timed pitches, provide equal access to questions and direct members to private comparison and interest forms rather than taking public commitments. Who could lead it: Independent host and timekeeper
- Hold role-specific conversations that test mutual fit, explain conditions, arrange adjustments and agree a bounded trial or another response without treating interest as proven suitability. Who could lead it: Project lead and relevant role approver
What should we look for?
- After 90 days, review Project Reverse Pitch Night. Look for roles being filled by choice, responsibilities being understood and useful work being completed without avoidable overload.
- Eligible roles published with complete purpose, task, time, authority, access, safety and support information.
- Expressions of interest acknowledged and closed within the published response period.
- Members entering a bounded trial only after a private fit conversation and any required approval or screening.
- Roles redesigned, deferred or withdrawn when the session exposes unclear value, excessive workload or unresolved conditions.
Before we say yes
- Does it fit a real local need?
- Can people take part safely and fairly?
- Are the facts, permissions and Rotary branding right?
- Who will lead it, and when will we review it?
